Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M Ahmadi, C.J.I., K S Paripoornan, S P Kurdukar, JJ.
SMT ANGOORI DEVI, APPELLANT;
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeals No. 368 of 1985 with Nos. 2493, 1294-95 of 1985 and 15695 of 1996, decided on March 19, 1997.
ORDER
Having read the decisions reported in State of U.P. v. L.J. Johnson [(1983) 4 SCC 110] (two-Judge Bench) and the decision reported in Meera Gupta v. State of W.B. [(1992) 2 SCC 494] and the referring order in Angoori Devi v. State of U.P. [(1997) 2 SCC 434 : JT (1997) 2 SC 88] we think that there are certain areas in these judgments which would require consideration and it would, therefore, be proper if the matters are placed before a larger Bench of 5 Honble Judges so that it is resolved once for all.
Court Masters
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
