SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 323

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Suhas C Sen, Sujata V Manohar
G. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY AND COMPANY AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS;
VERSUS
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER-IVB, VIJAYAWADA AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1426-28 of 1990 with Nos. 4678-4681 of 1990 and W.P. (C) No. 870 of 1990, decided on February 20, 1997.

Headnote:

Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Orissa Sales Tax Act - Agarbattis Were Liable To Sales Tax - Paying sales tax on agarbattis - These are appeals from an order passed by High Court by which large number of writ petitions were disposed of - Common question involved in all those writ petitions was whether agarbattis were liable to sales tax under Item 36 of First Schedule to Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Writ petitioners and other dealers in agarbattis were paying sales tax on agarbattis as general goods taxable at the rate of 4% and 5% - Item 36 of First Schedule of Act was amended thereafter and amended entry at the material point of time which fell for consideration of High Court was as, cosmetics and toilet preparations including scents, perfumes, face powders, talcum powders, hair tonics, hair oils, face creams and snows, pomades, depilatories, tooth powder, toothpaste, toothbrushes and shaving creams - It may be noticed that only change that was brought by amendment was to include scents and perfumes within Entry 36 - Departments stand is that "perfumes" would include agarbattis and this stand found favour with High Court - In that case, this Court had to construe word "perfume" falling under Item 37 of a notification issued under Madhya Pradesh Sales – Held, court are of the view that High Court overlooked sense in which "perfumery" was used in the Orissa Sales Tax Act - Initially "perfumery" was included in entry which included apart from "perfumery", cosmetics, pomades and all toilet articles - Having regard to nature of the goods included in the entry, "perfumery" could not have been given an extended meaning to include agarbattis - When "perfumery" was taken out of this entry and taxed as a luxury goods, a different and wider meaning could not be ascribed to it - No special definition was provided in Act by which agarbattis were included in "perfumery" - Court are of the view that High Courts were right in not giving an expanded meaning to "perfume" or "perfumery" and High Court was in error in including agarbattis within definition of "perfumery – In court judgment neither in common parlance nor by dictionary meaning nor having regard to context of Item 36 of First Schedule of Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act can it be said that "perfumes" would include agarbattis for purpose of imposition of sales tax - In view of the aforesaid, judgment under appeal is set aside - Appeals are allowed.

JUDGMENT

SEN, J. - These are appeals from an order passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court by which large number of writ petitions were disposed of. The common question involved in all those writ petitions was whether agarbattis were liable to sales tax under Item 36 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. The writ petitioners and the other dealers in agarbattis were paying sales tax on agarbattis as general goods taxable at the rate of 4% up to 8-7-1983 and 5% from 8-7-1983. Item 36 of the First Schedule of the Act was amended thereafter and the amended entry at the material point of time which fell for consideration of the High Court was as under :

"36. Cosmetics and toilet preparations including scents, perfumes, face powders, talcum powders, hair tonics, hair oils, face creams and snows, pomades, depilatories, tooth powder, toothpaste, toothbrushes and shaving creams."

2. It may be noticed that the only change that was brought by the amendment was to include scents and perfumes within Entry 36. The Departments stand is that "perfumes" would include agarbattis and this stand found favour with the High Court. The High Court mainly relied on the judgment of this Court in the case of CST v. Indian Herbs Research & Supply Co. [(1970) 25 STC 151 (SC)]. In that case, this Court had to construe the word "perfume" falling under Item 37 of a notification issued under the Madhya Pradesh Sales Act which was as under :

"37. Scents and perfumes (in English) and Itra tatha sugandhian (in Hindi)."

3. This Court noted in that judgment that the Oxford Dictionary defined the word "perfume" as follows :

"It is evident therefore that the word "perfume" originates from the word "fumare" which means to "smoke" or to emit vapour given off by some burning substance. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, Volume 17, 1965 Edition, at page 505, it is similarly pointed out that the literal meaning, of the word "incense" is the same as "perfume" but "perfume" has later on acquired an extended meaning so as to include anything sweet from smoking incense to fragrance of flowers. We are accordingly of the opinion that the word "perfume" in Item No. 37 of the Government notification should be construed in its ordinary sense, i.e., any substance natural or prepared which emits or is capable of emitting an agreeable odour either when burned or by the application of some foreign matter to induce any chemical reaction which results in fragrant odours being released from that substance."

4. There are several reasons why the meaning assigned to "perfume" in that case cannot be straightaway applied to construe Item 36 of the First Schedule of the Andhra Act. Unlike Entry 37 of the Madhya Pradesh Act which deals with "scents and perfumes", the entry in the Andhra Act is "cosmetics and toilet preparations". Agarbattis cannot be construed as either cosmetics or toilet preparations. Moreover, the meaning of this phrase has been clarified to include scents, perfumes, face powders, talcum powders, hair tonics etc."Scents and perfumes" must be construed having regard to the context of the other articles mentioned in Item 36. All the items mentioned in the inclusive definition are items of cosmetics or toiletry.

5. An inclusive definition has been given clarifying that cosmetic and toilet preparations would include scents, perfumes, face powders, talcum powders, hair tonics, hair oils, hair lotions, face creams and snows, pomades, depilatories, toothpowder, toothpaste, toothbrushes and shaving creams. The things specially mentioned in the entry "cosmetic and toilet preparations" are all of the nature of personal application. Incense sticks or agarbattis are goods of a different character altogether. These may emit a pleasant odour when burnt. That, however, will not bring agarbattis within the class of articles mentioned in Item 36 of the First Schedule. All these goods are articles of personal application."Perfume" in this context has to be construed eju




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top