SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 80

A. S. ANAND, N. S. HEGDE, V. N. KHARE
Jasbir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
U. T. , Chandigarh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- Leave granted.

2. The controversy in this appeal centres around cancellation of lease relating to Booth Site No. 407, Sector 44 C & D by the Estate Officer vide order dated 8th May, 1992, for default in payment of a part of the third instalment of the lease amount. On 29th May 1997, the writ petition filed by the appellant against the dismissal of his appeal by the Chief Administration was dismissed by the High Court. The order of the High Court has been put in issue through this appeal.

3. At the stage when notice was issued in this appeal, a direction was given on 8th May, 1998 restraining the re-auction of the site in question and the appellant herein was permitted to deposit the balance amount along with interest, penalty etc., without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Six weeks time was granted to the appellant to do the needful. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the total amount of the instalment as due together with interest, penalty etc. as per the statement of account furnished by the Estate Department to the appellant as on 30th June, 1998, was Rs. 3,45,185/- (although the amount which was required to be paid within three weeks on 15th Decembe



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top