JUDGMENT :- Issue notice.

2. The respondents are in caveat. Shri Ashok H. Desai, learned Senior Counsel represents the first and the second respondents the State of Tamil Nadu and the Sports Development Authority respectively. Shri V. R. Reddy, learned Senior Counsel represents the third respondent, the Tamil Nadu Film Producers Association.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. Leave granted. The matter is being disposed of finally in the following manner.

5. The minimal facts are these :

There is a Stadium known as Nehru Stadium in the city of Chennai owned by the Government of Tamil Nadu but in the care of the Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu. Its permissible user is fairly restricted. As far back on November 9, 1982 vide G.O. Ms. No. 2481 total ban has been imposed for conducting in the said Stadium activities other than sports and games and this ban is not only applicable to the said Stadium but to other Stadia in the State as well. The imperative need of keeping the Stadium isolated from illegitimate use had further been re-enforced by D.O. Lr. No. 7646/72/91, dated February 13, 1997 whereby it has been emphasised that the instructions that Sports Stadia should no