S.B.SINHA, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Meera Kanwaria – Appellant
Versus
Sunita – Respondent
Judgment
S.B. Sinha, J.—Leave granted.
Background fact :
2. The First Respondent herein was Rajput by caste. She married one Ghanshyam on 09.12.2000, who was a member of Scheduled Caste. The marriage was performed as per Vedic Hindu Rites. She applied for and granted a certificate of being belonging to Scheduled Caste by birth by the Sub Divisional Magistrate (S.D.M.), Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, describing her as a daughter of Ramaye, who in fact was her husband’s elder brother’s father-in-law.
3. An inquiry was caused to be made by the Sub Divisional Magistrate upon receiving a complaint that the said certificate contained wrong declaration as she was daughter of one Chinna Singh and not of Ramaye. The said allegations were found to be correct. It was also found that the First Respondent’s Jethani’s name was also co-incidentally Sunita. On the said premise, the certificate granted in her favour was cancelled by an order dated 10.07.2002 and a criminal case under Sections 406, 420, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code was registered. The said criminal case is still pending.
Election Proceedings :
4. The First Respondent herein contested an election for the Municipal Councilor from Ward N
State of Kerala & Anr. v. Chandra Mohanan
E.V. Chinnaiah etc. v. State of A.P. & Ors.
N.E. Horo v. Smt. Jahan Ara Jaipal Singh
C.M. Arumugam v. S. Rajgopal & Ors.
Thammanna v. K. Veera Reddy & Ors.
Kailash Sonkar v. Smt. Maya Devi
Sandhya Thakur v. Vimla Devi Kushwah & Ors.
Sobha Hymavathi Devi v. Setti Gangadhara Swamy & Ors.
Lillykutty v. Scrutiny Committee, SC & ST & Ors.
The Principal, Guntur Medical College, Guntur & Ors. v. Y. Mohan Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.