Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S.Pathak, CJI., M.H.Kania, J.
Madhu Milan Syntex Private Limited
Versus
Union Of India
Case No. : 4719 of 1985
Date of Decision : 5/3/88
(1) IN view of our Judgment delivered today in CivilNo. 1110 of 1986 entitled UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS V. MADHU MILAN SYNTEX PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER*, this Special Leave must he dismissed as we have upheld the judgment and order dated 24/11/1984 passed by the division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High court which is challenged to a certain extent in this Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
