SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 481

RANGANATH MISRA, P. B. SAWANT
Surja – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, A.Subhashini, G.RAMASVAMY, R.P.SINGH PAL

JUDGMENT

RANGANATH MISRA, C.J.I.

(1) THIS is an application under Article 32 of the Constitution by 55 persons - both men and women - claiming the benefit of the scheme of pension for Freedom Fighters.

(2) IT is the common contention of the petitioners that they had joined the Arya Samaj movement in the late 1930s within the erstwhile Nizams State of Hyderabad and each of them had been convicted under different provisions of the criminal law then prevailing within the Nizams State and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. In the case of most of them the term of imprisonment was around two years. They maintained that the Arya Samaj movement has been equated with the freedom struggle and the benefit of the pension scheme is admissible to those who had participated in the movement as Arya Samajists. According to them, in the prime of youth the petitioners had been motivated by the call of Mahatma Gandhi,the Father of the Nation and leaders like the late Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, Dr Rajendra Prasad and others and bad given up their home and hearth and had joined the agitation within the Nizams State and suffered the consequences. Since their claim for pension had not bee






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top