SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 217

ASHOK BHAN, ARUN KUMAR
Puma Ayurvedic Herbal (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpur – Respondent


Judgment

Arun Kumar, J.—The appellant claims to be a manufacturer of Ayurvedic products which are intended to cure certain ailments of the human body. A question has arisen as to whether the products manufactured by the appellant fall within the category of medicaments or cosmetics. Answer to this question determines as to whether the goods are classifiable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as cosmetics under Chapter 33 or as medicaments under Chapter 30. As cosmetics the rate of excise duty is quite high while as medicament the products attract nil duty. The following products manufactured by the appellant are under consideration :

1. (xvii) Puma Neem Facial Pack (Neemal)

2. (xviii) Puma Anti-Pimple Herbal Powder (Pimplex)

3. (xix) Puma Herbal Facial Pack (Herbaucare)

4. (xx) Puma Herbal remedy for Facial Blemishes

5. (xxi) Puma Herbal Massage Oil

6. (xxii) Puma Herbal Massage Oil for Women

7. (xxiii) Puma Hair Tonic Powder (Sukeshi)

8. (xxiv) Puma Scalp Tonic Powder (Scalpton)

9. (xxv) Puma Anti-Dandruff Oil (Dandika)

10. (xxvi) Puma Shishu Rakshan Tel

11. (xxvii) Puma Neem Tulsi.

2. The appellant has a licence to manufacture these and other products from the Drug Controller under the





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top