R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR, C. K. THAKKER
MAHAR JAHANS – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. THIS IS AN UNFORTUNATE LITIGATION IN WHICH A CIVIL DISPUTE, PURE AND SIMPLE, HAS BEEN GIVEN THE COLOUR OF A CRIMINAL CASE. THE PARTIES LITIGATING ARE THE WIFE, HER SONS AND DAUGHTERS ON ONE SIDE AND THE HUSBAND ON THE OTHER. THE HUSBAND CLAIMS THAT HE HAS DIVORCED THE WIFE. IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A HOUSE PROPERTY KNOWN AS HOUSE NO. 360-A, GALI NO. 21, ZAKIR NAGAR, OKHLA, NEW DELHI. CLAIMING TO BE IN POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY, THE SONS AND DAUGHTERS HAVE FILED A SUIT AGAINST THE FATHER IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DELHI, REGISTERED AS CIVIL SUIT NO. 404 OF 2003. IT IS A SUIT FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMANENT PREVENTIVE INJUNCTION. THE PLAINTIFFS HAD PRAYED FOR THE DEFENDANT (RESPONDENT 2 BEFORE US) BEING RESTRAINED FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFFS FROM THE SUIT PROPERTY AND ALSO RESTRAINING THE DEFENDANT FROM ENTERING INTO ANY DEALING RELATING TO THE PROPERTY.
3. IN THE YEAR 1993, RESPONDENT 2 INITIATED PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 145 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (CRPC) COMPLAINING OF APPREHENSION OF BREACH OF PEACE OCCASIONED BY DISPUTE AS TO POSSESSION OVER THE HOUSE PROPERTY. THE LEARNED SDM PASSED AN ORDER IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT 2 PROTECTING H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.