SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 873

R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR, C. K. THAKKER
MAHAR JAHANS – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. THIS IS AN UNFORTUNATE LITIGATION IN WHICH A CIVIL DISPUTE, PURE AND SIMPLE, HAS BEEN GIVEN THE COLOUR OF A CRIMINAL CASE. THE PARTIES LITIGATING ARE THE WIFE, HER SONS AND DAUGHTERS ON ONE SIDE AND THE HUSBAND ON THE OTHER. THE HUSBAND CLAIMS THAT HE HAS DIVORCED THE WIFE. IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A HOUSE PROPERTY KNOWN AS HOUSE NO. 360-A, GALI NO. 21, ZAKIR NAGAR, OKHLA, NEW DELHI. CLAIMING TO BE IN POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY, THE SONS AND DAUGHTERS HAVE FILED A SUIT AGAINST THE FATHER IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DELHI, REGISTERED AS CIVIL SUIT NO. 404 OF 2003. IT IS A SUIT FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMANENT PREVENTIVE INJUNCTION. THE PLAINTIFFS HAD PRAYED FOR THE DEFENDANT (RESPONDENT 2 BEFORE US) BEING RESTRAINED FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFFS FROM THE SUIT PROPERTY AND ALSO RESTRAINING THE DEFENDANT FROM ENTERING INTO ANY DEALING RELATING TO THE PROPERTY.

3. IN THE YEAR 1993, RESPONDENT 2 INITIATED PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 145 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (CRPC) COMPLAINING OF APPREHENSION OF BREACH OF PEACE OCCASIONED BY DISPUTE AS TO POSSESSION OVER THE HOUSE PROPERTY. THE LEARNED SDM PASSED AN ORDER IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT 2 PROTECTING H






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top