SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 225

N. S. HEGDE, B. P. SINGH
HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM – Appellant
Versus
MUKESH KUMAR – Respondent


ORDER :

N. Santosh Hegde, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The only question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a person who has been selected in a competitive examination has any legal right for extension of time for joining the selected post.

4. The respondent herein was selected by the appellant to the post of Assistant Engineer/Electrical (Trainee) by its appointment letter dated 5-7-1999, the respondent having accepted the said offer, sought for extension of time to join the post till 15-9-1999, which the appellant granted. On the expiry of the said period, the respondent sought further time till 15-10-1999 by his letter dated 6-9-1999. The appellant did not accede to this request of the respondent but advised him to join the department by 15-9-1999 and thereafter seek leave, if need be, from the appropriate committee. The respondent did not comply with this advise of the appellant, on the contrary he made a further representation seeking a further time of one month to join the service, that is, a month more than what was denied by the appellant as per its letter dated 10-9-1999. Even though the extension of time was refused by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top