TARUN CHATTERJEE, ARIJIT PASAYAT
A. P. Foods – Appellant
Versus
S. Samuel – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J. — Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which was affirmed by a Division Bench in Writ Appeal by the impugned judgment.
2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :
Appellant is run by Andhra Pradesh Nutrition Council and is owned and controlled by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The Nutrition Council is registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telengana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 (Act 1 of 1350 Fasli). The principal object is to provide and supply nutritious foods to school and pre-school children, pregnant women and lactating mothers and such other categories of beneficiaries as the Government from time to time decide within the general framework of the Government social welfare programmes. It is claimed to be a non-profit motive establishment. It does not sell or distribute its product either in public or to outsiders except those selected by the Government of Andhra Pradesh under its programmes. In April, 1982 a question arose regarding demand of payment of bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (in short the Act) to the employees of the appella
Basant Kumar Sarkar and Ors. v. Eagle Rolling Mills Ltd. and Ors.
Chandrakant Tukaram Nikam v. Muncipal Corporation of Ahmedabad and Anr.
Sharad Kumar v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
Premier Automobiles Ltd. v. Kamlekar Shantarum Wadke
Nirmal Singh v. State of Punjab
Rajasthan SRTC v. Krishna Kant
V. Veerarajan and others v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.