S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
U. Raghavendra Acharya – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. — These appeals involving identical questions of fact and law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The appellants in these appeals are retired teachers of the University and Private Aided Colleges (to whom UGC scales of pay were applicable). They have retired during the period 1.1.1996 to 31.3.1998. So far as the teachers of the University or Privates Aided Colleges are concerned, indisputably, they were being paid the same salary as was being paid to the teachers of the Government colleges. The appellants in Civil Appeal No.1391/2006, have retired from the Karnataka Regional Engineering College, Surathkal, Karnataka, which was established by the Government of India at the request of the Government of Karnataka. It is a centrally aided institution as envisaged under Entry 64 of List 1 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. So far as the said institution is concerned, its expenditure used to be borne by the Government of India and the State of Karnataka. It, however, has been notified by the Government of India as a Deemed University with effect from 26.6.2002.
3. It is not in dispute that the
Chairman, Railway Board and Ors. v. C.R. Rangadhamaiah and Ors.
K.L. Rathee v. Union of India & Ors.
Subrata Sen and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Indian Ex-Services League & Ors. v. Union of India
Transmission Corporation, A.P. Ltd. v. P. Ramachandra Rao & Anr.
K.T. Veerappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
State of West Bengal and Anr. v. W.B. Govt. Pensioners Associations and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.