ORDER

1. The learned counsel for Respondents 1, 2 and 3 are present in the court on caveat. Respondent 4 is pro forma party so far as these proceedings are concerned.

2. Leave granted.

3. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties present, the appeals are heard finally.

4. Proceedings for imposition of anti-dumping duty under the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 are in progress. A notification imposing provisional anti-dumping duty was issued, the life whereof has come to an end. Respondentherein filed a writ petition in the High Court laying challenge to the provisional duty as also other proceedings which are in progress. On 25-1-2005, during the course of hearing before the High Court, the High Court on a prayer made by Respondent 1 herein, passed an order that final findings in the anti-dumping proceedings shall not be recorded by the designated authority. Subsequently, by order dated 16-2-2005, the High Court modified its earlier order and directed that the designated authority may proceed to record the final findings but the same shall be kept in a sealed