SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 363

ANIL KUMAR HARITWAL – Appellant
Versus
ALKA GUPTA – Respondent


( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted.

( 3 ) THE appellants herein were convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, gwalior for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs 2000. The said court also awarded a compensation of rs 10,25,000 to the complainant.

( 4 ) IN appeal filed against the said conviction and sentence by the appellants herein, the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior allowed the same, setting aside the conviction and sentence. In appeal filed by the plaintiff against the said order before the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur bench, Gwalior, the High Court allowed the said appeal reversing the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge and restored that of the trial court.

( 5 ) IN this appeal the parties before us have filed a compromise petition bringing to our notice that dispute between them has since been settled and the amount due to the respondent complainant has been paid, therefore, a prayer is made in the interest of justice, that conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants may kindly be quashed. Learned counsel fo


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top