Supreme Court Of India
ANIL KUMAR HARITWAL
Versus
ALKA GUPTA
Decided on March 23, 2004
Negotiable Instruments Act, Sections 138 and 147 - Criminal Procedure Code, Section 320 - Compounding of offence - Appellants convicted under Section 138 of the Act and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs. 2000. The said court also awarded a compensation of Rs. 10,25,000 to the complainant- Conviction set aside in appeal but restored by High Court- Compound application filed by parties- Offence allowed to be compounded under Section 147 of the Act- Conviction set aside and appeal allowed [Paras 5 and 6]
( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.
( 2 ) LEAVE granted.
( 3 ) THE appellants herein were convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, gwalior for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs 2000. The said court also awarded a compensation of rs 10,25,000 to the complainant.
( 4 ) IN appeal filed against the said conviction and sentence by the appellants herein, the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior allowed the same, setting aside the conviction and sentence. In appeal filed by the plaintiff against the said order before the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur bench, Gwalior, the High Court allowed the said appeal reversing the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge and restored that of the trial court.
( 5 ) IN this appeal the parties before us have filed a compromise petition bringing to our notice that dispute between them has since been settled and the amount due to the respondent complainant has been paid, therefore, a prayer is made in the interest of justice, that conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants may kindly be quashed. Learned counsel for the appellants placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Texmaco Ltd. v. State of A. P. where this Court on similar facts and circumstances of that case, had allowed such prayer and set aside the conviction and sentence.
( 6 ) WE have perused the records of the said case, which in our opinion are similar to the facts of the present case and we think it proper that prayer of the parties seeking to settle the dispute and praying for setting aside the conviction and sentence should be allowed. In the said view of the matter following the judgment of this Court in the above case, we allow this appeal setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants in the interest of justice in view of the fact that the dispute is settled between the parties and Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act permits compounding of the offence.
( 7 ) THE appeal is allowed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.