Back
Supreme Court Of India
(Record of Proceedings)
B.N. KIRPAL, CJI., ARlJITPASAYAT AND H.K. SEMA, JJ.
M.C. MEHTA -Petitioner
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS -Respondents.
IAs Nos. 1783, 22 and 129 in WP (C) No. 4677 of 1985 with IAs Nos.
1784 to 1789, 1791 and 1531, decided on May 6, 2002
ORDER
IAs Nos. 1783 and 1784
1. Issue notice. Mr D.N. Goburdhun accepts. Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder be filed within four weeks thereafter. List after eight weeks.
2. Issue notice. Mr Bharat Singh accepts. Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder be filed within four weeks thereafter. In the meantime, within 48 hours from today the Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana is directed to stop all mining activities and pumping of groundwater in and from an area up to 5 km from the Delhi-Haryana border in the Haryana side h of the ridge and also in the Aravalli hills.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
