Back
Supreme Court Of India
S.P. Bharucha, CJI., SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, U.C. BANERJEE, S.N. VARIAVAAND SHlVARAJV. PATIL, JJ.
SHANTI BHARDWAJ (SMT) -Appellant;
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER -Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 80 of 1995
decided on December 12,2001
ORDER
1. This civil appeal relates to land covered by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The said Act was repealed by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999. Section 4 of the repealing Act states that all proceedings relating to any order made under the principal Act pending before the commencement of the repealing Act before any court shall abate. That these proceedings have abated is not disputed on behalf of the respondents.
2.The civil appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as having abated.
3.No order as to costs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
