SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 471

Supreme Court Of India
West Bengal Govt. Employees (Food and supplies) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Ors.
Versus
Smt. Sulekha Pal (Dey) and Ors.
Decided on : April 16, 2003

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right of intermediaries to retain possession of land under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 is subject to the limits prescribed in the statute and that the vesting is complete upon notification under Section 4.

Headnote:

Vesting of Intermediaries' Rights - West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Section 6, Section 10 - The judgment discusses the rights of intermediaries to retain land under Section 6 of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. It also addresses the procedure for taking possession under Section 10 and the legal effect of agreements for sale and settlements made by the State Government. The court affirms the right of intermediaries to exercise their choice of retention and emphasizes that vesting is complete upon notification under Section 4 and that the right to hold possession is subject to the limits prescribed in the statute.

Fact of the Case:

The case concerns the rights of an intermediary, Shri Ganga das Pal, and his heirs to retain possession of land following the vesting of intermediary rights. The appellants, including the State of West Bengal and a Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order of vesting dated 16. 9. 1971. The court found that the appellants had not lawfully dispossessed the heirs of the intermediary and affirmed their right to exercise their choice of retention.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellants had not lawfully dispossessed the heirs of the intermediary and affirmed their right to exercise their choice of retention. The court also emphasized that the vesting is complete upon notification under Section 4 and that the right to hold possession is subject to the limits prescribed in the statute.

Issues: The main issue was whether the heirs of the intermediary had the right to exercise their choice of retention following the vesting of intermediary rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right of intermediaries to retain certain lands under Section 6 does not come to an end once and for all after the prescribed date and that the right to hold possession is subject to the limits prescribed in the statute. The court also emphasized that the vesting is total and complete upon notification under Section 4.

Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and the court affirmed the right of the heirs of the intermediary to exercise their choice of retention. The court also reserved liberties to parties on either side to vindicate their rights under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.

Judgment

D. RAJU, J.

( 1 ) ). The above appeals have been filed against the common order dated 18. 4. 1996 in F. M. A. T. No. 3357 of 1992 filed in the High Court by the appellants in cano. 12509 of 1996 and F. M. A. TNo. 3391 of 1992 filed by the State of West Bengal appellant in C. A. No. 442,of 1998, whereunder the Division Bench of the High Court, except for making certain modification of the order of the learned Single Judge and partly allowing the appeals, affirmed the decision so rendered.

( 2 ) ). The West Bengal Estates Acquisition act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "the Estates Acquisition Act") came into force on 12. 2. 1954. On 15. 4. 1954, a Notification was issued under Section 4 (1) vesting all estates and the rights of ail intermediaries in the State free from all encumbrances and thereupon the State became the paramount title-holder by virtue of section 5 also. Under Section 6, notwithstanding anything contained in Sections 4 and 5, an intermediary shall be entitled to retain with effect from the date of vesting land comprised in homesteads; land comprised in or appertaining to buildings and structures owned by the intermediary or by any person, not being a tenant holding under him by leave or licence: agricultural and non-agricultural lands in his khas possession, not exceeding twenty-five acres in area and fifteen acres in area respectively, subject to the stipulations contained therein as to the nature of such land and the total extent that could be so retained of different categories of such property. Sub-section (5) of Section 6 reads as follows :-"an intermediary shall exercise his choice for retention of land under subsection (1) within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed. If no choice is exercised by him during the prescribed period, the Revenue Officer shall, after giving him an opportunity of being heard, allow him to retain so much of the lands as do not exceed the limits specified in clauses (c), (d) and (j) of that sub-section :provided that nothing in this sub-section shall require an intermediary to exercise th6 choice if he has already done so before the date of coming into force of West Bengal Estates Acquisition (Second Amendment) Act, 1957. "

( 3 ) ). If, as indicated in the said provision, no choice of retention was exercised within the period stipulated under Rule 4a of the Rules, the Revenue Officer, after giving the intermediary an opportunity, shall allow him to retain the prescribed quantum of land in proceedings known as Big Raiyat Case (B. R. Case ). Section 10 enables the Collector to take charge of estates and interests of intermediaries, which vest in the State under Section 5. Sub-sections (2), (5) and (6) of Section 10, which are relevant for the purpose of consideration of the issues raised in these cases, read as follows.-" (2) For the purpose as aforesaid, the collector may, by a written order served in the prescribed manner, require any intermediary or any person in possession khas or symbolical (of any such estate or of any such interest to give up such possession by a date to be specified in the order which shall not be earlier than sixty days from the date of service of the order) and to deliver by that any documents, registers, records and collection papers connected with the management of such estate or of such interest which are in his custody and to furnish a statement in the prescribed form in respect of such estate or such interest; (5) Nothing in this section shall, authorize the Collector to take khas possession of any estate or of any right of an intermediary therein, which may be retained under section 6; and (6) If after any estate or any interest therein of an intermediary has vested in the State under section 5, the intermediary or any other person possesses any land which was in the khas possession of the intermediary before the date of vesting but which the intermediary has not retained or cannot retain under section 6, then, whether possessio




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top