SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 102

B.P.SINGH, G.B.PATTANAIK, R.P.SETHI
Shiela Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Sagar Tiwari – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS review application was filed against the judgment of this Court dated 8-11-1996 since reported in 1996 6 SCC 599. By the said judgment a Bench of two learned Judges of this Court decided the validity of allotments of 52 shops and stalls made by Smt. Shiela Kaul (petitioner herein), the then Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Govt. of India, on a public interest petition and came to hold that the allotments had illegally been made. Having held so, the Court also considered the question as to what appropriate directions could be issued under the facts and circumstances of the case and having examined the earlier order of the Court dated 4th Nov. 1996 in the case of Capt. Satish Sharma for illegal allotment of Petrol Pump and L. P. G. Dealership and awarding Rs. 50 lakhs as damages, in the case in hand directed that Smt. Kaul should pay an exemplary damage to the tune of Rs. 60 lakhs. The Court also further observed that the C. B. I. should investigate into the matter without being influenced by any observations made by the Court and then decide the course of action on the material collected and available in course of investigation. We are told that in the meantime

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top