SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 456

S. P. KURDUKAR, A. M. AHMADI
SHRIRAM FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

CA No. 1953 of 1986

1. In this appeal the assessee raises two claims, namely, (1) one under Notification No. 198 of 1976 dated 16-6-1976, and (2) the claim of interest on credit, Le., credit sales. So far as the first issue is concerned, learned counsel for the appellant fairly states that it is covered against the assessee by our decision in Modi Rubber Ltd. v. Union of India1 and, therefore, the assessee is not entitled to any relief under that head. So far as the second contention is concerned, we think that the assessee would be entitled to relief in view of this Courts decision in Govt. of India v. MRF Ltd. 1 However, so far as the question of granting relief under that head is concerned, the matter will have to go back to the Assistant Collector, who will determine the issue after allowing the appellant to place on record such material in support thereof as is in their power, possession and custody. The appeal will stand allowed to that limited extent only with no order as to costs.

CA No. 1954 of 1986

2. The issue arising in this case for determination is answered by this Court in the decision - Modi Rubber Ltd. v. Union of India1. The learned counsel for the appellan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top