Back
A. R. LAKSHMANAN, A. K. MATHUR
G. B. Pant University – Appellant
Versus
Govind Ballabh Pandey – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—Leave granted.
2. Heard Vijay Hansaria, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-University and Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
3. One hundred seventy employees working in the cafeteria of the students’ hostel of the appellant-University raised an industrial dispute seeking regularisation. The Labour Court in its award dt. 19.9.1995 held that the employees working in the cafeteria were the employees of the University and were entitled to the benefits of regular employees. The Labour Court directed regularisation of 170 employees from the date of the order. The University filed the Writ Petition before the High Court of Allahabad challenging the aforesaid award. The High Court by its judgment dt. 10.08.2000 dismissed the appeal of the appellant and directed regularisation of the services of the employees in terms of the award of the Labour Court and payment of arrears of salary in 12 instalments. This court gave the aforesaid direct on on the basis that about 170 employees were still working in the cafeteria. The appellant issued an office order asking the employees to complete formaliti
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
