SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1037

S. B. SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Harihar Bhole Nath – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. - Leave granted.

2. Interpretation and application of Regulation 351-A of the Civil Service Regulations falls for consideration in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 29.3.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench at Lucknow allowing the Writ Petition No.435 of 2002 filed by Respondent herein.

3. The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. Respondent was appointed as a Clerk. He rose up to the position of Deputy Inspector General of Registration. He was charged with commission of misconduct involving gross irregularities while he was posted at Faizabad on preliminary enquiry by the then Inspector General of Registration, pursuant whereto and in furtherance whereof a charge-sheet dated 22.3.1993 was served on him on 24.3.1993, and an Enquiry Officer was appointed, stating:

"O.M.No.S.R.1605/11-93-312(58)/93 dtd.24th March, 1993 issued by the Special Secretary to the Government of Uttar Pradesh

Government of Uttar Pradesh Finance (Stamp and Registration), Section No.S.R.1605/11-93-312(58)/93

Lucknow : The 24th of March, 1993 (Issued on 24.3.1993)

Office Memorandum

Whereas on the charge





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top