LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Mr. C. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Glaxo Smithklin Pharmaceutical Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.—
1.Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the writ appeals filed by the appellant. Both the appeals were filed to set aside the common judgment and order passed in Writ Petition nos.462/95 and 695/96 by a learned Single Judge on 13.4.1999.
2.The background facts in a nutshell are as follows :
3.On 4.8.1976 Glaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the “said Company”) which has now been taken over by the present respondent no.1 (Glaxo-SmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) indicated their intention to advertise the post of “Industrial Relations Executive”. Since members of the staff who fell in the category of “Management Staff Grade-III” were also entitled to apply for the vacant post which fell in “Management Staff Grade-II”, an advance staff notice was also taken out by the Company. The same incorporated the text of the advertisement which was to follow. The relevant part from the advertisement which pertains to the duties required to be performed by the selected candidates was as follows:-
“The selected candidate will advise the Corporate personal Department and
Hussain Mithu Mhasvadkar v. Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board and Anr.
Ruston & Hornsby (I) Ltd. v. T.B. Kadam
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. v. Rameshwar Rahod
Sonepat Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Ajit Singh
Muir Mills Unit of NTC (U.P.) Ltd. v. Swayam Prakash Srivastava and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.