SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju
Commissioner of Municipal Corporation, Shimla-PETITIONER
Prem Lata Sood and Others-RESPONDENT
Appeal (civil) 2525 of 2007
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2525 OF 2007
[Arising out S.L.P. (Civil) No. 3292 of 2006]
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/05/2007
Planning Permission - Town and Country Planning Act, 1977 - Section 17, 25, 30, 31, 76, Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 - Section 243, 244, 245, 246, 247 - The court discussed the provisions of the Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977 and the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, focusing on the requirement of planning permission, the authority of the Municipal Corporation to grant or refuse sanction, and the legal implications of the notifications issued by the State Government. The court emphasized the complementary and supplementary nature of the two Acts, the binding nature of the development plans, and the authority of the Municipal Corporation to grant sanction in conformity with the building bye-laws and other laws.
Fact of the Case:
The respondents intended to construct a hotel in Shimla and applied for planning permission and building plan sanction. The State Government granted planning permission, subject to obtaining building permission from the Municipal Corporation. The respondents' building plan was returned for clarifications, and a temporary freeze on construction activities was imposed by the State Government. Subsequently, the Corporation rejected the building plan based on the freeze and amendments in the interim development plans. The respondents filed a writ petition seeking relief from the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the freeze and amendments did not apply to the respondents' building plan, as the State's sanction had conferred a vested right. The Court directed the Corporation to process the resubmitted building plans and pass orders within a specified time frame, allowing construction if the Corporation failed to comply.
Issues: The issues involved the authority of the Municipal Corporation to reject building plans, the impact of the State's notifications on the respondents' vested rights, and the reasonableness of the time frame for processing building plans.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the complementary nature of the Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977 and the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, and the binding nature of the development plans. It held that the Corporation's authority to grant sanction was subject to conformity with building bye-laws and other laws. The court also clarified that the legal fiction of deemed sanction under Section 247 of the 1994 Act had restricted operation.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The court held that the freeze and amendments applied to the respondents' building plan, and the Corporation's rejection was justified. The respondents' vested rights were not affected, and the Corporation's authority to grant sanction was subject to conformity with the law. The court emphasized public interest and the need to protect the heritage zone in Shimla.
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J :
1.Leave granted.
2.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.08.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 herein, praying, inter alia, :
"i)That the respondents may be directed to accord necessary planning permission to the petitioners for construction of hotel pursuant to Annexures PA, PB, PC & PG in a time bound schedule;
ii)That the impugned Annexures PD, PE, PF & PH, dated 24.3.1998, 1.9.1999, 6.6.2000 & 8.2.2002 respectively may be quashed and set aside";
was allowed.
3.The State of Himachal Pradesh enacted The Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977 (for short, the 1977 Act) to make provisions for planning and development as well as use of land; to make better provision for the preparation of development plans and sectoral plans with a view to ensuring that town planning schemes are made in a proper manner and their execution is made effective to constitute the Town and Country Development Authority for proper implementation of town and country development plan, to provide for the development and administration of special areas through the Special Area Development Authority to make provisions for the compulsory acquisition of land required for the purpose of the development plans and for purposes connected with the matter aforesaid.
4.Development has been defined in Section 2(g) of the 1977 Act to mean :
"development" with its grammatical variations means the carrying out of a building, engineering, mining or other operations in, on, over or under land, or the making of any material change in any building or land, or in the use of either, and includes sub-division of any land;"
Planning area has been defined in Section 2(o) of the 1977 Act to mean :
"planning area" means any area declared to be planning area under this Act;"
5.Section 3 of the 1977 Act provides for appointment of a Director or other officers for the purpose of carrying out the functions under the provisions of the said Act. Section 10 of the said Act provides for restriction on use of land or development thereof, sub-section (3) whereof reads as under :
"(3)If any work is carried out in contravention of the provisions of this section, the Municipal Corporation or Municipal Committee within its such local area, and the Collector in area outside such local areas may cause such work to be removed or demolished at the cost of the defaulter, which shall be recovered from him in the same manner as an arrear of land revenue."
6.Section 14 of the 1977 Act provides for preparation of development plans by the Director. Section 17 provides for interim development plans, pursuant to or in furtherance whereof the interim development for the planning area has been made to which reference shall be made at an appropriate place.
7.In terms of the said provisions, an interim development plan is to be made after consultation with the local authority concerned. Sub-section (5) of Section 17 mandates the State Government to publish the interim development plan in the official gazette.
8.Chapter VI of the 1977 Act provides for control of development and use of land. Section 25 thereof reads as under :
"25.The overall control of development and the use of land in the planning area shall, as from the date of publication in the official Gazette of a notification by the State Government, vest in the Director."
9.Section 30 of the 1977 Act provides for an application for permission for development by a person other than Union Government, State Government, a local authority or a special authority constituted thereunder.
An application therefor is required to be filed in the office of the Director. Section 31 provides for the mode and manner in which such application shall be governed, inter alia, stating :
"(5)If the Director does not communicate his decision whether to grant or refuse permission to the app
SB. Internationa] Ltd. v. Asstt. Director Genera! of Foreign Trade
M.C. Mehta (Badkhal and Suraj Kund Lakes Matter) v. Union of India and Others
Union of India and Others v. Indian Charge Chrome and Another
Live Oak Resort (P) Ltd. and Another v. Panchgani Hill Station Municipal Council and Another
Commissioner of Police, Bombay v. Gordhandas Bhanii
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
State of West Bengal etc. v. Terra Firma Investment and Trading Pvt. Ltd. etc.
R.S. Garg v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
T. Vijayalakshmi and Others v. Town Planning Member and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.