A.R.LAKSHMANAN, ALTAMAS KABIR
Popcorn Entertainment – Appellant
Versus
City Industrial Development Corpn. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
DR. A.R. LAKSHMANAN, J.
SLP (C) NO. 11085 OF 2006
1. Leave granted.
2. The above appeal was filed against the final judgment and order dated 30.06.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P.No. 9467 of 2005 whereby the High Court has rejected the writ petition filed by the appellants by holdin that the appellants have an equally officious remedy of filing a civil suit and thus the writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked.
BACKGROUND FACTS:
The appellant made an application for allotment of a plot on 18.05.2004 for construction of a multiplex at Kharghar railway station. The first respondent, The City Industrial Development Corporation (in short, "CIDCO") asked the appellants to pay an EMD of Rs. 20 lacs being 10% of the tentative price of the plot in order to consider the application of the appellant. The appellant deposited the said amount of EMD immediately. CIDCO, vide its Board Resolution dated 03.06.2004, approved the allotment in favour of the appellant considering the fact that there were no multiplex in the area and the earlier effort of CIDCO to advertise for such plots had met with no response. CIDCO issued allotment letter in favour of the appellant askin
Chairman & MD. BPL. Ltd. v. S.P. Gururaja & Ors. [JT 2003 (Suppl.2) SC 515] (Para 31)
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar ofTrademarks
Kerala State Electricity Board & anr. v. Kurien E. Kelathil & Ors. [JT 2000 (8) SC 167] (Para 42)
Pavanendra Narayan Verma v. Sanjay Gandhi PGI Medical Sciences & Anr. [JT 2001 (9) SC 420] (Para 25)
Harbanslal Sahnia & Another v. Indian Oil Ltd. & Ors. [JT 2002 (10) SC 561] (Para 15)
Chandra Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. [JT 2003 (6) SC 20] (Para 25)
National Highways Authority of India v. Ganga Enterprises & anr. [JT 2003 (Suppl.1) SC 85] (Para 42)
Printers (Mysore) Ltd. v. M.A. Rasheed & Ors. [JT 2004 (4) SC 158] (Para 31)
Rajureshwar Associates v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [JT 2004 (5) SC 249] (Para 42)
Smt. Gunwant Kaur & Ors. v. Municipal Committee Bhatinda & Ors [1969 (3) SCC 769] (Para 15)
Hazi Mastan v. Kerala Financial Corporation [JT 1987 (4) SC 368] (Para 30)
Union of India & Ors. v. E.G. Nambudiri [JT 1991 (2) SC 285J (Para 25)
Dr. Bal Krishna Agarwal v. State of U .P. & Ors. [JT 1995 (1) SC 471] (Para 15)
Sanjana M. Wig (Ms.) v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. [JT 2005 (8) SC 334] (Para 15)
Corporation of the City of Bangalore v. Bangalore Stock Exchange [2003 (10) SCC 212]{Para 15)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.