SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 292

RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA, DALVEER BHANDARI
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. This suit relates to a dispute regarding the boundaries between the States of Orissa and Andhra Pradesh. The State of Orissa which is the plaintiff claims that certain villages which fell within the territory of Orissa were being trespassed upon by the State of Andhra Pradesh.

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh raised certain preliminary objections including, inter alia, the objection that the suit was not maintainable before this Court in its original jurisdiction by virtue of the proviso to Article 131 of the Constitution of India.

3. The factual dispute relates to the question whether certain villages should form part of Salur or Pottangi taluk. Pottangi taluk appears to be within the territory of the State of Orissa whereas Salur within the territory of Andhra Pradesh. According to the State of Orissa a portion of Salur taluk plan falls within the State of Orissa. This is disputed by the State of Andhra Pradesh.

4. "On 1-12-1920, the Governor General-in-Council with the sanction of the Secretary of State for India directed that with effect from 1-12-1920, a new district called the Agency division comprising of the agency tracts of the Ganjam, Vijagapatam and Godavari district




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top