SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 137

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI AND G.L. OZA, JJ.
M/s. Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd., Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others (with appln. for ex parte stay & exemption), Respondents.
Spl.Leave Petns. (Civil) Nos. 4826 and 7045, 5240 of 1987; C.M.P. Nos. 12029-31 of 1987 ( in C.A. Nos. 577-79 of 1987); C. M. P. Nos. 16635 and 16918 of 1987 (in SLP(C) No. 4826 of 1987) and Transferred Cases Nos. 13 and 14 of 1987,
D/- 12-2-1988.
AND
National Textile Corporation, New Delhi and another, Petitioners
Versus
Swadeshi Mining and Manufacturing Co.Ltd., Lucknow and others, Respondents.
AND
Naresh Kumar Parti, Applicant
Versus
T.R.Tuli and others, Respondents.
AND
Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd., Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others (for directions), Respondents.
AND
Swadeshi Mining and Manufacturing Co. Ltd., and another etc., Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others (with CMP Nos. 16887-89 & 17018/87 with office report), Respondents.
Advocates Appeared
Mr. K. Parasaran, Attorney General, Mr. Milon K. Banerjee, Solicitor General, Mr. F. S. Nariman, Dr. Y. S. Chitale, Mr. H. L. Anand, Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Mr. A. K.Ganguli, Mr. S. N. Kacker and Mr. Anil B. Diwan Sr.Advocates, Mr. A.K. Sharma, Mr. Harish N. Salve, Mr. K. J. John, Mr. S. Swarup, Mr. T. V. S. N. Chari, MS. Vrinda Grover, Miss A. Subhashini, Mr. A. Subba Rao, Mr. R. B. Mehrotra, Mr. B. B. Sawhney, Mr. N. K. Sharma, Mr. S. Swarup, Mr. P. V. Kapur, Mr. P. P. Malhotra, Miss. Annoradha Dutt, Mr. P. Parmeshwaran, Mr. Navin Prakash and Mr. Naresh K.Sharma Advocates with them, for Appearing parties.

Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, A.K.SHARMA, A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, Anil B.Divan, ANNORADHA DUTT, B.B.Sawhney, F.S.NARIMAN, H.L.Anand, HARISH N.SLAVE, K.J.JOHN, K.K.VENUGOPAL, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, M.K.BANERJI, N.K.SHARMA, NARESH K.SHARMA, NAVIN PRAKASH, P.P.MALHOTRA, P.P.Rao, P.V.KAPUR, R.B.MAHATO, S.N.KACKAR, S.SWAROOP, T.V.S.N.Chari, VRINDA GROVER, Y.S.Chitale

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 39 (b) – Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 – Section 3 – Government property – Wealth of Company - Whether equity shares in the two companies shares in Swadeshi Polytex Limited in Swadeshi Mining and Manufacturing Company Limited, held by the Swadeshi Cotton Mills, vest in the Central Government under Section 3 of the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 other subsidiary question is whether the immovable properties, vested in the Government – Question as to one more property known as Shrubbery property whether it has been taken over or not is still to be argued and is not covered by this judgment –Held, To leave a company, the net wealth of which is negative at the time of take over of the management, with the shares held by it as investment in other company, in our opinion, is not only to defeat the principles of Article 39 (b) and (c) of the Constitution but it will permit the company to reap the fruits of its mismanagement – That would be an absurd situation – It has to be borne in mind that the net wealth of the company at the time of take over, was negative, hence sections 3 and 4 can be meaningfully read if all the assets including the shares are considered to be taken over by the acquisition – That is the only irresistible conclusion that follows from the construction of the documents and the history of this Act – Court have to bear in mind the Preamble of the Act which expressly recites that it was to ensure the principles enunciated in clauses (b) and (c) of Article 39 of the Constitution – Act must be so read that it further ensures such meaning and secures the ownership and control of the material resources to the community to subserve the common good to see that the operation of economic system does not result in injustice – Order accordingly.

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. - What falls for consideration in all these matters is a common question of law, namely, whether equity shares in the two companies i.e. 10,00,000 shares in Swadeshi Polytex Limited and 17,18,344 shares in Swadeshi Mining and Manufacturing Company Limited, held by the Swadeshi Cotton Mills, vest in the Central Government under Section 3 of the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The other subsidiary question is whether the immovable properties, namely, the bungalow No. 1 and the Administrative Block, Civil Lines, Kanpur have also vested in the Government. The question as to one more property known as Shrubbery property whether it has been taken over or not is still to be argued and is not covered by this judgment.

2. In order to appreciate the question in these matters it has to be borne in mind that there were six original proceedings initiated by various parties which gave rise to these civil appeals, special leave petitions and the transferred cases to this Court. These six original proceedings are as follows :

(1) On 18th of February, 1987 Suit No. 418 of 1987 was filed before the Delhi High Court by one Naresh Kumar Parti against Dr. Raja Ram Jaipuria, Swadeshi Polytex and others, praying for an order of injunction restraining the company from holding the 17th annual general meeting on the ground that 34 shares in Swadeshi Polytex have vested in National Textile Corporation (briefly referred to as NTC) in view of sections 3 and 4 of the said Act. In this suit an application for grant of interim injunction was also filed praying that in the event the annual general meeting of. the company is allowed to be held an independent Chairman should be appointed to conduct the meeting. Notice in respect of the said application was served upon the respondents on 20th of February, 1987. On 4th March, 1987 the Delhi High Court refused to pass any order in view of the order already passed by the Allahabad High Court mentioned hereinafter. Against this order of the Delhi High Court, two special leave petitions were filed in this Court one by Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd., which was defendant No. 10 in the Delhi suit. (Consequent upon grant of leave, the special leave petition came to be registered as Civil Appeal No. 577 of 1987). The other special leave petition was filed by the plaintiff in the Delhi Suit, Naresh Kumar Parti. (Consequent upon grant of leave, the special leave petition came to be registered as Civil Appeal No. 578 of 1987). On 24th of February, 1987 one. Hari Prasad Aggarwal, filed a suit being Case No. 183 of 1987 in the Court of Third Additional Civil Judge, Kanpur praying, inter alia, that Shri Raja Ram Jaipuria should not preside over the 17th annual general meeting of the Company. On 27th of February, 1987, the application for interim injunction filed in the said suit was dismissed by the learned trial Judge. In appeal which is not yet numbered preferred by the plaintiff before the Allahabad High Court an order was passed by the Court on 2nd March, 1987 appointing Shri M. P. Wadhawan as the Chairman of the said annual general meeting. The consenting parties to the said proceedings before the Allahabad High Court were Shri Raja Ram Jaipuria and Swadeshi Polytex Limited. Against this order of 2nd March, 1987 passed by the Allahabad High Court M/s. Doypack Systems Private Limited preferred a special leave petition in this Court. Leave was granted and as mentioned hereinbefore it was registered as Civil Appeal No. 577 of 1987. The three special leave petitions were heard together as Civil Appeals Nos. 577, 578 and 579 of 1987 and were disposed of by a common order on 6th March, 1987 by this Court appointing Shri Jaswant Singh as the Chairman of the said annual general meeting.

3. On 26th of February, 1987 another suit being suit No. 506 of 1987, was filed in the Delhi High Court by one Mukesh Bhasin p



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top