SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1068

A. K. MATHUR, MARKANDEY KATJU
MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
RELIANCE ENERGY LTD – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 125 of the of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter for short "the Act") is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by the appellate Tribunal for Electricity whereby the appellate Tribunal has allowed the appeals filed by the distribution companies and set aside the orders passed by the Maharashtra electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter for short "the Commission") dated 23. 2. 2005. The Commission on 3. 8. 2004 addressed a notice to all its licensees/distribution companies in Maharashtra and made an inquiry from them with regard to raising of the bills by the said licensees/distribution companies on the basis other than the actual meter reading for the relevant period, when large variations in consumption were noticed, or for other reasons. The notice dated 3. 8. 2004 sent by the Commission to all its licensees/distribution companies reads as under :-

"several instances have come to the commission's notice of so-called "amendment", "supplementary" or other such bills being raised by some licensees to consumers, often several years later, on a basis other than the actual meter reading for the relevant period, whe




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top