ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.SATHASIVAM
Md. Kalam @ Abdul Kalam – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
judgment
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1.Leave granted.
2.Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench. Challenge in the appeal before the High Court was to the judgment and order dated 10.4.2002 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Class II, Jaipur. By the said judgment, the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation.
3.Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :
In the intervening night of 8-9th May, 1994 when Vishwas (PW-3) and his wife Renu Jain (PW-1) were sleeping in their house situated in Mauji Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, five persons entered the house and tied their servant Chaturbhuj who was sleeping in the basement of the house. Thereafter, the accused also tied the mouth, hands and legs of Vishwas Jain (PW-3) and his wife Renu (PW-1) and then bolted them inside the bathroom and having threatened them at the point of pistal and knife, the accused looted the gold and silver ornaments, coins and ca
State (Delhi Admn.) v. V. C. Shukla
Jadunath Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Rameshwar Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Ram Nath Mahto v. State of Bihar
Ramanbhai Naranbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra
Munshi Singh Gautam (dead) v. State of M.P.
Kanta Prashad v. Delhi Administration
Vaikuntam Chandrappa v. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Boota Singh
Santokh Singh v. Izhar Hussain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.