LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Narayanamurthy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Appellant-Narayanamurthy (A-1) has filed this appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.12.2006 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.903/2000, whereby and whereunder appeal filed by the State against the judgment and order dated 19.04.2000 passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore City, in S.C. No.178/1995 acquitting the appellant and Shivabhushanamma (A-3), for the offences under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code [for short ‘IPC’] and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, has been allowed in part and A-1 has been convicted and sentenced under Section 498A and Section 304B, IPC.
3. In all, three accused persons, namely, Narayanamurthy (A-1), his father Kannappa (A-2) and mother Shivabhushanamma (A-3), were tried by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore City, under Sections 498A and 304B of IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [for short ‘DP Act’]. During the pendency of trial, A-2 died. The learned trial Judge found the evidence of prosecution witnesses insufficient and lacking
Jaswant Singh v. State of Haryana
Kaliyaperumal v. State of T. N.
State of Rajasthan v. Raja Ram
Ramesh Babulal Doshi v. State of Gujarat
Hira Lal v. State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi
Satvir Singh v. State of Punjab
State of A. P. v. Raj Gopal Asawa
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
Kamesh Panjiyar Alias Kamlesh Panjiyar v. State of Bihar
Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.