SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1487

2008(8) Supreme 89
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Andhra Pradesh High Court)
K.G. Balakrishnan, CJI., P. Sathasivam and J.M. Panchal, JJ.
Sahiti and others — Appellants
versus
The Chancellor, Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences and others — Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6202 of 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C) No.13424 of 2007)
With
Civil Appeal Nos.6203,6204, 6206-6211 and 6212 of 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.13525/2007, 14281/2007, 18798-18803/2007 and 21051/2007)
Decided on : 12-10-2008

Advocates appeared:
Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G., T.R. Andhyarkujina, V. Kanagaraj, Altaf Ahmed, M.N. Rao, L.N. Rao, Sr. Advs., G.V.R. Choudhry, K. Shivraj Choudhuri, Guntur Prabhakar, Ms. Altaf Fathima, M. Vijaya Bhaskar, Y. Raja Gopala Rao, D.V. Nagarjuna Babu, Y. Ramesh, Ms. Y. Vismai Rao, Shakil Ahmed Syed, Manoj Saxena, Rajneesh Kr. Singh and Rahul Shukla (for T.V. George), Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Re-evaluation of answer scripts in the absence of specific provision is perfectly legal and permissible.

Headnote:(a) N.T.R. University of Health Sciences Act 1986 – Section 12(2) r/w 12(3) – Vice-Chancellor has power to take appropriate action relating to the affairs of the University, which includes conduct of examination also – Re-evaluation of answer scripts in the absence of specific provision is perfectly legal and permissible. (Para 9)

        (b) Court can only consider whether the decision of he educational authority is arbitrary, unreasonable, mala fide and whether it contravened any statutory or binding rule – Court should show due regard to the opinion expressed by the authority. (Para 9)

        (2004) 13 SCC 383; (2004) 6 SCC 714 – Relied upon.

       Facts of the case :

        1. The appellants joined first year MBBS course for the academic year 2006-07 in different private medical colleges which are affiliated to the University, Vijaywada. They appeared in the first year M.B.B.S. examination held from September 5, 2006 to October 10, 2006. The results of the examination were declared on December 2, 2006.

        2. In all 4076 students had appeared in examination out of whom 992 students were declared failed in different papers.

        3. Out of the 992 students who had failed, 436 students applied for re-totalling of their respective answer scripts. When the process of re-totalling was going on, some representations were addressed to the Chancellor of the university, and the Hon’ble Minister for Medical and Health as well the Vice-Chancellor of the university complaining that answer scripts of three papers i.e. Anatomy, Physiology and Bio-Chemistry were not properly valued and the valuation was harsh whereas some questions in Physiology were out of syllabus and because of all these factors, the percentage of students who had cleared the examination was low.

        4. The Vice-Chancellor constituted a committee of three expert professors on January 3, 2007 for re-verification/re-valuation/re-examination of answer scripts. On the basis of re-verification made by the Committee appointed by the Vice-Chancellor, the University declared revised results on February 2, 2007 and 294 students out of 436 students, who had applied for re-totalling, were declared “Pass”.

        5. The Executive Council had approved the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor.

        6. Subsequent to the declaration of the results, complaints of large scale irregularity in the process of re-verification were received.

        7. On being directed by the Governor/Chancellor the Executive Council of the University resolved to ask the Government of Andhra Pradesh to constitute a high level committee to go into the circumstances under which re-verification of answer sheets was undertaken and find out whether any irregularities had taken place as also to withhold declaration of the revised results of First Year M.B.B.S. course till the enquiry report was submitted.

        8. Executive Council unanimously cancelled the whole process of re-valuation and directed the students who had failed in September/October 2006 examination to reappear in the examination which was scheduled to take place on April 25, 2007.

        9. Writ petitions were filed challenging the decision of the Executive Council. The learned single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by the students.

        10. Division Bench of the High Court allowed the writ appeals filed by the Registrar of the University.

       Finding of the Court :

        Ordering re-evaluation of answer scripts of only 436 students out of 992 without prescribing any methodology for doing so and completing the job in only two days was not proper. Executive Council was right in canceling the same.

       Result : Supplementary examination directed.

JUDGMENT

J.M. Panchal, J. —

1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.

2. The instant appeals are directed against judgment dated July 20, 2007 rendered by the Division Bench of High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Appeal No. 402 of 2007 and other cognate appeals by which the common judgment dated May 1, 2007, rendered by the learned single Judge of the High Court upholding action of the Vice-Chancellor of Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijaywada (for short “the University”) of re-verification/re-valuation/re-examination of answer scripts of 436 students, who had failed in first year MBBS examination during academic year 2006-07, is set aside and the decision of the Executive Council to cancel the result of re-verification of answer scripts and asking 294 students, who were declared passed on re-verification of answer scripts to re-appear in examination of first year MBBS, is upheld.

3. The appellants, who are students, joined first year MBBS course for the academic year 2006-07 in different private medical colleges which are affiliated to the University, Vijaywada. They appeared in the first year M.B.B.S. examination held from September 5, 2006 to October 10, 2006. The results of the examination were declared on December 2, 2006. The record shows that in all 4076 students had appeared in examination out of whom 992 students were declared failed in different papers. In the results published by the university, it was specifically mentioned that such of those students who wanted to attend personal identification for re-totalling of their theory answer scripts should submit their applications on or before December 13, 2006. This personal identification was meant to enable the students to apply for re-totalling of their answer scripts. Out of the 992 students who had failed, 436 students applied for re-totalling of their respective answer scripts. When the process of re-totalling was going on, some representations were addressed to His Excellency, the Governor, who is Chancellor of the university, and the Hon’ble Minister for Medical and Health as well the Vice-Chancellor of the university on behalf of the students in the name of MBBS First Year Students’ Parents’ Association with complaints of improper and under valuation of answer scripts. In the complaints, it was stated that answer scripts of three papers i.e. Anatomy, Physiology and Bio-Chemistry were not properly valued and the valuation was harsh whereas some questions in Physiology were out of syllabus and because of all these factors, the percentage of students who had cleared the examination was low. It is the case of the students that, the Vice-Chancellor, after listening to their grievances, assured that he would verify the answer books and if necessary, get them re-examined. Having regard to the nature of complaints received, the Vice-Chancellor constituted a committee of three expert professors on January 3, 2007 for re-verification/re-valuation/re-examination of answer scripts. The Committee undertook re-verification of the answer scripts and recorded marks on printed slips of papers which were stapled at the top of answer scripts. On the basis of re-verification made by the Committee appointed by the Vice-Chancellor, the University declared revised results on February 2, 2007 and 294 students out of 436 students, who had applied for re-totalling, were declared “Pass”. The action taken by the Vice-Chancellor of re-totalling and re-verification of the answer sheets of First Year M.B.B.S. examination held in September/October, 2006 was placed before Executive Council for its ratification. The matter was considered by Executive Council and the Council had approved the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor. The revised results were sent to the Principals of medical colleges. Subsequent to the declaration of the results, after re-valuation His Excellency, the Governor of the State, as well as the Minister for Medical, Health













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top