JUDGMENT (TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.)

By a separate Judgment, my learned brother R.V. Raveendran, J. has allowed the appeal, whereas, by this Judgment, I have dismissed the appeal for the reasons set out in the Judgment.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th May, 2005 passed by a learned Judge of the High Court at Calcutta in C.O. No.3868 of 2004. By the impugned order, the learned Judge, in the exercise of his supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution, had set aside the concurrent orders of the courts below which had rejected the application for injunction filed by the plaintiffs-respondents and directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to the suit properties which have been fully described in Schedules `A and `B to the plaint as follows: Schedule A

"All that piece and parcel of land measuring 6.5 decimal together with structures standing thereon in Dag No.129 Khatian No.943, R.S. Plot No.233 being the portion of premises No.108A, Dr. Girindra Sekhar Basu