SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 367

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CJI K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, D.K. JAIN, JJ.
THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - APPELLANT
Versus
P. BHASKAR and others - RESPONDENT
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1617-1618 OF 2008
(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 24667-24668 OF 2005)
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1619-1620 OF 2008
(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 25382-25383 OF 2005)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1621-1622 OF 2008
(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 26434-26435 OF 2005)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1623-1624 OF 2008
(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 26436-26437 OF 2005)
Decided On: 27-2-2008

Headnote:

Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 22, 22(ii)(e) and 33 – Andhra Pradesh Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1992 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 309 - Post of Deputy Collectors - Seniority - Limited recruitment – Promotion – Cadre - Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal - Appointment to post of Deputy Collectors is governed by Rules, 1992, framed under proviso to Article 309 of Constitution - As per these Rules 1/3rd of substantive vacancies in category of Deputy Collectors have to be filled up by direct recruitment and 2/3rd of vacancies by promotion from feeder cadre of Tehsildars - Rule 22 (ii) (e) of Rules enables Government that if in any recruitment qualified candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes are not available limited recruitment confined to such candidates could be resorted to - As 2/3rd of vacancies of Deputy Collectors have to be filled up by promotions, there was dearth of candidates in category of Scheduled Tribes for being promoted to post of Deputy Collectors – Held, Rule 22(ii)(e) is intended to protect interests of reserved candidates and if again a general recruitment is made there will be non-availability of reserved candidates and even if they are recruited subsequently they would be much junior to general candidates and they would be ranked as very junior to all general candidates who had been appointed earlier - But as these vacancies came to be converted from promotion vacancies, they had a different channel of limited recruitment as candidates were not available for promotion - But unfortunately such recruitment could not be done by Public Service Commission in time, thereby their appointment could be made much after general recruitment - As facts disclose, there was only one general recruitment and that was followed by limited recruitment of these posts - It may be due to delay caused by Public Service Commission that there could not be timely appointment of candidates who were recruited by limited recruitment – Petition disposed of

JUDGMENT:

K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI.

1. Leave granted.

2. The Appeals arising out Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 24667-24668 of 2005 are filed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the other Appeals are filed by the officers who were aggrieved by the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petitions Nos. 10604/2004 and 10965/2005. The writ petitioners in W.P. No. 10604/2004 filed OA No. 6246 of 1998 before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short "the Tribunal") contending that they should be declared as seniors to the Deputy Collectors who were appointed on 9.12.1993, though they were appointed as Deputy Collectors on 9.12.1994.

3. The facts, in short, are as follows.

3.1. The appointment to the post of Deputy Collectors is governed by the Andhra Pradesh Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1992, framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. As per these Rules, 1/3rd of substantive vacancies in the category of Deputy Collectors have to be filled up by direct recruitment and 2/3rd of the vacancies by promotion from the feeder cadre of Tehsildars. Rule 22 of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") provides for reservation in favour of the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and other categories. Rule 22 (ii) (e) of the Rules enables the Government that if in any recruitment qualified candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes are not available, limited recruitment confined to such candidates could be resorted to. As 2/3rd of the vacancies of Deputy Collectors have to be filled up by promotions, there was dearth of candidates in the category of the Scheduled Tribes for being promoted to the post of Deputy Collectors. In 1991 the posts of Deputy Collector to be filled up by promotion from the Scheduled Tribes candidates accumulated to 12 and then on 15.11.1990, the Head of Department sent a proposal to government to consider filling up of 12 Scheduled Tribe candidates by direct recruitment to fill up the 12 carry forward vacancies. The Government accepted the proposal and issued GO Ms. No. 264 dated 01.04.1991 and set apart 12 posts of Deputy Collectors to be filled up by the Scheduled Tribes candidates by "limited recruitment". Steps were taken to recruit the eligible candidates through the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission (for short "the Commission").

4. Meanwhile, as part of the general recruitment, the Commission had issued advertisement on 1.8.1990 inviting applications with a view to undertake recruitment to different categories of posts in Group 1 and 2(a) of the Andhra Pradesh State Service, including the category of Deputy Collector. This selection consisted of both general recruitment and limited recruitment. The process of selection consisted of preliminary examination and final examination. A preliminary examination was held on 27.1.1991, but on 5.2.1991 the Government of Andhra Pradesh revised the maximum age limit of the candidates. In view of this relaxation of age granted to the candidates, fresh applications were called for and for additional applicants a preliminary examination was held on 14.4.1991. The Commission prescribed 88 marks as cut-off marks and the main examination was held on 9.11.1991. Some Original Applications were filed before the State Administrative Tribunal challenging the selection process. The Tribunal gave certain directions. These OAs were disposed of by the Tribunal on 4.6.1992 with the following directions :-

(a) "The selection for general recruitment pursuant to the advertisement No. 8/90 as well as the supplemental advertisement shall be confined to the vacancies meant for direct recruitment for the various services which were available on 01.05.1990 as contemplated by G.O. Ms.No. 103 GAD dt. 03.02.67. For this purpose the State Government should immediately arrive at the correct figure of vacancies for each service (together with reservati






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top