LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, S.B.SINHA
Sulochana – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J.
Leave granted.
2. Whether the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a composite suit filed by the appellant herein for eviction of the tenant is the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 28th September, 2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Second Appeal No. 260 of 2004, whereby and whereunder while allowing the appeal filed by the respondent, the suit filed by the appellant for eviction of the respondent was dismissed.
3. The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute.
4. The premises in dispute is a shop located on the ground floor of House No.370-D, Parasi Mohalla, Neemuch Cantt, in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Appellant purchased the property in question on 23rd March, 1996 from Smt. Anntu Jenra w/o Sh. Turab Bhai. Respondent was a tenant under the predecessor-in-interest of the appellant on a monthly rent of Rs.200/- per month. By a letter dated 29th July, 1996 the appellant informed the respondent in regard to the purchase of the property by her and requested the respondent for payment of monthly rent to her. Since, despite the service of the said letter, the
Referred to : Nandlal v. Nangibai
Ashok Kumar Gupta vs. Vijay Kumar Agarwal
Ashok Kumar Gupta vs. Vijay Kumar Agarwal
Dhannalal vs. Kalawatibai and others
Winifred Ross and another vs. Evi Fonseca and others
Dr. D.N. Malhtora vs. Kartar Singh
Swamy Atmananda and Others v. Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.