SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 884

P.SATHASIVAM, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bhupendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. - 1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the Habeas corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short the `Constitution) by one Bhupendra (hereinafter referred to as the `detenu)

3-4. Prayer in the writ petition was to quash and set aside the decision and order passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar dated 23.4.2007 and the decision and order passed by the Under Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department (Special) by order dated 12.6.2007. The order of detention was passed by the respondent No. 2 in purported exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981(in short the `Act). The detaining authority detained detenu under the Act. Grounds of detention were served on 23.4.2007. Several acts of the detenu were highlighted which according to the detaining authority warranted detention.

The appellant primarily took the stand that the order of detention indicated cases relating to law and orde












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top