SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 169

2009(1) Supreme 629
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab and Haryana High Court)
R.V. Raveendran and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ.
Faridabad Gas Power Project, NTPC Ltd., etc. — Appellants
versus
Om Prakash & Ors., etc. — Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 493 of 2007
WITH
C.A.No.525, 523, 520, 518, 524, 506, 519, 522, 512, 508, 502, 507, 504, 509, 517, 553, 554, 552, 549, 526, 551, 510, 516, 514, 521, 515, 513, 511, 584, 582, 583, 696, 580, 579, 574, 576, 533, 532, 527, 529, 530, 531, 528, 571, 581, 578, 575, 500, 572, 497, 567, 563, 565, 561, 558, 501, 494, 564, 560, 559, 557, 556, 562, 555, 499, 536, 537, 541, 544, 546, 548, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 535, 547, 545, 656, 543, 542, 540, 539, 871, 845, 655, 698, 569, 566, 568 and 570 of 2007.
And
C.A. No.730 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C) No. 7457/2007],
C. A. No. 731 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C) No. 7460/2007],
C.A. No.732 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.7458/2008],
C. A. No. 735 of 2009
[arising out of SLP (C) No.3211/09 [CC 3846/2007
C. A. No.733 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C) No. 3209/09 [CC 3880/2007],
C. A. No.734 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C) No. 3210/09 [CC 3893/2007],
C. A. No. 736 of 2009
[arising out of SLP (C)No.11558/2007],
C.A. No.737 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.9385/2007],
C.A. No.738 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.9485/2007],
C.A. No.739 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.7031/2006],
C.A. No.740 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.7032/2006],
C.A. No.741of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.7033/2006],
C.A. No.742 of 2009
[arising out of SLP(C)No.7008/2006]
Decided On : 05-02-2009

IMPORTANT POINT
Principles for fixing market value of land to be acquired discussed.

Headnote:(a) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 23 – Fixation of market value by the Civil Court with reference to contemporaneous sale transactions was proper – One of the modes of computing the market value would be with reference to judgments and awards passed in respect of acquisitions of similar land – Extent of the land, the nature thereof, advantages and disadvantages occurring therein amongst others would be relevant factors – Market value of agricultural lands is lower than that of the land suitable for commercial purposes – Enormity of financial implication of enhancement in view of the size of the land acquired for a particular project should be kept in mind. (Para 8)

        1995 Suppl. (2) SCC 28; (1996) 2 SCC 152; (2004) 2 SCC 283; (2003) 12 SCC 642; (1996) 2 SCC 62; (1996) 9 SCC 640; (2003) 1 SCC 354; (2005) 12 SCC 1; (2003) 12 SCC 334; (2004) 1 SCC 467; (1989) 2 SCC 329; (1989) 4 SCC 250; (2007) 9 SCC 447; (1992) 4 SCC 659; (2004) 6 SCC 533; JT 2008 (9) SC 480; (2005) 4 SCC 789; (2005) 6 SCC 454; (2005) 12 SCC 564; (1998) 8 SCC 136 – Relied upon.

       Facts of the case :

        1. The State of Haryana issued Notification for acquisition of a track of 319.31 acres of lands in five villages, namely, Mujheri (154.23 acres), Neemka (67 acres), Sihi (73 acres), Jhajru (24.12 acres) and Pyala (0.96 acres) situated in Tehsil Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad, for public purpose, namely, for construction of 400 MW Faridabad Gas Based Power Project with an ultimate capacity of 1200 MW [a unit of National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, Government of India Enterprise].

        2. Compensation was awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector, Faridabad.

        3. The reference court allowed the reference applications made by the claimants and accordingly, enhanced the amounts of compensation.

        4. High Court dismissed all the appeals and thereby confirmed the award made by the reference court.

       Findings of the Court ;

        Market value of the acquired land at Mujheri, Sihi and Neemka would be Rs.289/- per square yard.

        Market value for the Jhajru lands at Rs.205/- per square yard.

        Market value of the acquired land at Payala correctly fixed at Rs.3,00,000/- per acre.

       Result :

        Appeals filed by the NTPC in regard to the lands acquired at villages Mujheri, Sihi and Neemka are allowed in part while the appeals filed by claimants-land owners for enhancement of compensation in regard to lands of villages Mujheri, Sihi and Neemka dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. —

1. Delay condoned and leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.

1.1) The appellant-Faridabad Gas Power Project, NTPCL, has filed Civil Appeal Nos.493, 523, 520, 518, 524, 519, 522, 512, 508, 502, 504, 509, 517, 553, 554, 552, 514, 521, 515, 513, 584, 582, 583, 596, 580, 579, 574, 576, 532, 527, 529, 531, 528, 571, 497, 567, 501, 494, 564, 560, 545, 656, 543, 540, 539, 570 of 2007 and Civil Appeal arising out of S.L. P. [C] No. 7033/06 with regard to village Mujheri; Civil Appeal Nos. 525, 506, 507, 549, 511, 533, 530, 561, 559, 557, 556, 562, 536, 541, 546, 586, 587, 590, 535, of 2007 and Civil Appeal arising out of S.L. P. [C] Nos.7457, 9485 of 2007, 7032, 7008 of 2006, 7460, 7458, 3846, 3880, 3893, 9385 of 2007 with regard to village Sihi; Civil Appeal Nos. 551, 510, 578, 565, 555, 499, 589, 592, 547 of 2007, Civil Appeal arising out of S.L. P. [C] No.11558 of 2007 with regard to village Jhajru; Civil Appeal Nos.544, 548, 588, 542, 655, 698 of 2007, and Civil Appeal arising out of S.L.P. [C] No.7031 of 2006 with regard to village Neemka and Civil Appeal Nos.516, 575, 500, 572, 563, 558, 537, 591 of 2007 with regard to village Pyala.

1.2) Civil Appeal Nos.569, 566 and 568 of 2007 have been filed by claimants, who are residents of village Mujheri; whereas Civil Appeal Nos.526, 581, 585, 871, 845 of 2007 have been filed by claimants of village Jhajru for enhancement of the amounts of compensation.

2. All the aforesaid appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 29.05.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in Regular First Appeal No.1543 of 2000 and a batch of 146 connected appeals. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has dismissed the appeals filed by M/s. Faridabad Gas Power Project, National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, as well as by the land owners and confirmed the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2000 passed by the Additional District Judge, Faridabad, in land references preferred under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in these cases they were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

3. The brief facts, which led to the filing of these appeals, are as follows:-

3.1) The State of Haryana issued Notification dated 16.08.1995 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [for short ‘the Act’] for acquisition of a track of 319.31 acres of lands in five villages, namely, Mujheri (154.23 acres), Neemka (67 acres), Sihi (73 acres), Jhajru (24.12 acres) and Pyala (0.96 acres) situated in Tehsil Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad, for public purpose, namely, for construction of 400 MW Faridabad Gas Based Power Project with an ultimate capacity of 1200 MW [a unit of National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, Government of India Enterprise].

3.2) The Land Acquisition Collector, Faridabad [for short ‘LAC’] awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 2,50,000/- per acre for Chahi land, i.e. about Rs.52/- per sq. yard and Rs.2,00,000/- per acre, i.e. Rs.42/- per sq. yard for Banjar Kadim and Gair Mumkin lands falling in the revenue estate of villages Mujheri, Neemka and Sihi. For the land acquired in village Jhajru, the LAC awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.1,57,000/- per acre for Chahi land and Rs.1,50,000/- per acre for ‘Gair Mumkin’ land. With regard to the acquisition of land in village Pyala, the LAC awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.1,50,000/- per acre for Chahi land. Other statutory benefits for which the claimants are entitled to were also awarded to the land owners.

3.3) Being aggrieved against and dissatisfied with the award passed by the LAC, the claimants preferred reference applications under Section 18 of the Act. According to the claimants, they are entitled to the enhancement of compensation as their land acquired by the State has potential value for residential or commercial purposes. The State of Haryana contested the references, inter a



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top