S.B.SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Dharam Pal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. —
1.Leave granted.
2.Union of India is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 13.7.2005 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition Nos. 8457/2000, 8458/2000 and 8489/2000.
3.Respondents herein joined the Railway services as Signal Khalasis in S & T Department, Delhi Division, Northern Railway in the year 1970. The next promotional post was the one of Material Checking Clerk (MCC). The terms and conditions of service are governed by Indian Railway Establishment Manual (IREM). Rule 174 of IREM regulates procedure for appointment to Class-III (Group-C) posts i.e. Office Clerk. It provides that the vacancies in the said category are to be filled from two sources (i) 66-2/3% by direct recruitment through the agency of the Railway Recruitment Boards; and (ii) 33-1/3% by promotion by selection of specified Group ‘D’ staff. We are concerned with the second one.
4.Respondents, thus, could be appointed in the post MCC only in terms of the procedure of selection laid down therein. The selection procedure for appointment in the grade of Office Clerk is laid down in Chapter II, Section B of the IREM and
T. Vijayan v. Divisional Railway Manager
M.K. Shanmugam v. Union of India
State of W.B. v. Aghore Nath Dey
Swapan Kumar Pal v. Samitabhar Chakraborty
Direct Recruit Class-II Engineering Officers’ Association v. State of Maharashtra
Raj Kishore Vishwakarma v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.