SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 593

Nair Service Society – Appellant
Versus
T. Beermasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.K. Venugopal, Rakesh Dwivedi, Krishnan Venugopal, T.L.V. Iyer, P.P. Rao, M.N. Rao, L. Nageswara Rao, Dr. Rajiv Dhavan, Sr. Advs., S. udaya Kumar Sagar, Ms. Bina Madhavan, Shwetank Sailkwal, Ms. Utra Babbar, Shyam Mohan, S. Ravi Kumar, Shyam Mohan for M/s. Lawyer’s Knit & Co., C.S. Rajan, A.D. Sikri, Romy Chacko, A. Venayagam Balan, Vipin Nair, P.B. Suresh for M/s. Temple Law Firm, G. Prakash, Beena Prakash, L. Nageshwara Roy, Anand, Roy abraham, Ms. Seema Jain, Himinder Lal, Ramesh Babu, M.R. E.M.S. Anam, Fazlin Anam, K.S. Gopalan, M.T. George, P. Jacob, Boby Augustine, Ranjith K.C., Harish Beeran, S. Marzook, Radha Shyam Jena, C.K. Sasi, K.S. Venugopalan, Harshad V. Hameed, K. Rajeev, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Markandey Katju, J. —

Civil Appeal Nos. 1991, 1993, 1994, 2000 of 2009 [@ SLP(C) Nos. 20419, 29345, 30967 & 2674 of 2008]

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals have been filed against the judgment dated 23.5.2008 passed by the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in WP No. 1697 of 2007. The appellant society in the first of the appeals is an incorporated body rendering social service. It purports to espouse the cause of merit in appointments in government service and public sector undertakings. The appellant in the second of the appeals (not a party before the High Court) is a general category candidate whose chance of selection and appointment as a medical officer was adversely affected by the decision of the High Court. The appellant in the third of the appeals is the Kerala Public Service Commission, which is entrusted the task of executing the recruitment and selection process. The appellants in the fourth of the appeals (not parties before the High Court) are candidates included in the rank list prepared and published by PSC for different posts in various departments. According to them they would have been advised and appointed but for the interpretation placed by the





































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top