ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Koppisetti Subbharao @ Subramaniam – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.—
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the ‘Code’). The prayer in the petition was to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 440 of 4999 and CC No.325 of 2001 on the file of 3rd Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada.
3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:
A case was registered against three accused persons including the present appellant for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’). Initially, the presence of A-1 could not be secured and therefore court separated the case against A-1 and proceeded the trial against A-2 and A-3. In the said case A-2 and A-3 were acquitted. Thereafter, the present application was filed before the High Court taking the stand that the complainant was not be the legally wedded wife of the appellant as he was already married and, therefore, Section 498-A has no application to the facts of the case.
The High Court dismissed the
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd., v. State of Bihar
Goodyear India Ltd. v. State of Haryana
P.E.K. Kalliani Amma v. K. Devi
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd.
S. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P.
Ameer Trading Corporation Ltd., v. Shapporji Data Processing Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.