SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1085

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, P. SATHASIVAM, J. M. PANCHAL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:G.R. Vahanvati, Sol. Genl. of India, Ravindra Srivastava, Nidhesh Gupta, Arun Jaitley, Shyam Divan, Raju Ramchandra (NP), Senior Advocates, S.W.A. Qadri, Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, D.D. Kamat, Kunal Verma, Ms. Supriya Jain, Krishna Kumar (for B.K. Prasad), Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Anirudh Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, Ajay Bansal, Ajay Choudhary, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Shree Prakash Sinha, Shekhar Kumar, Ms. Rudreshwar Singh, Amanpreet Singh Rahi, Tushar Bakshi, Devesh Tripathi, Kumar Ranjan, Kaushik Poddar, Gopal Jha, Tapesh Kumar Singh Advocates with them For the Respondents:L.N.Rao(NP), Raju Ramachandran (NP), senior advocates, Dharam Bir Raj Vohra, Ms. Binu Tamta, Ms. V. Mohana, Sanjay Jain, Santosh Paul, Arvind Gupta, M.J.Paul, K.K. Bhat, Advocates.

Judgment :-

K.G. Balakrishnan, CJI.

1) S.L.P.(C) Nos. 13571-13572 of 2008 are filed by the Union of India against the order dated 20.03.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in W.P. (C) Nos. 1814 & 1815 of 2008. Other aggrieved persons filed S.L.P. (C) Nos. 13297-13298, 13581 and 14834-14838 of 2008. Being aggrieved by the action of the Union Public Service Commission and the Government of India through which candidates in reserved category selected in unreserved category were given choice to opt for service of higher preference in terms of Rule 16(2) of the Civil Services Examination Rules, (hereinafter referred to as "CSE"), successful candidates filed Writ Petition (c) Nos. 297, 312, 336 & 416 of 2008 under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India to declare Rule 16(2),(3),(4) and (5) of the Civil Services Examination Rules, 2002 as ultra vires being inconsistent with Rule 16(1) of the said Rules as violative of Arts. 14, 16(4) and 335 of Constitution of India, consequently, quash the second provisional list released by Press Note dated 26.6.2008.

2) In Civil Services Examination 2005, in the first phase, UPSC recommended 425 candidates keeping the consolidated reser








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top