SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 804

Supreme Court of India
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
M.A. Antony @ Antappan
Versus
State of Kerala
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.811 OF 2009 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5624 of 2006)
Decided on : 22-04-2009

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:K.V. Vishwanathan, M. Gireesh Kumar, Rajeev Nambeesan, B. Raghunath, Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Advocates, For the Respondent:Amarendra Sharan, ASG, R. Sathish, Amit Anand Tiwari, P. Parmeswaran Advocates.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 449, 379, 380, 302 and 201 - Brutal murder of six members of family - Death sentence - Accused/appellant was in dire and urgent need of more money and he had a motive for getting said amount of money - His presence inside house supported by factors like presence of his fingerprints, presence of hair on deceased's body and absence of accused/appellant from his house - All necessary precautions required u/s 164(2) CrP.C. taken by Magistrate before recording confession - Cash and Gold ornaments stolen from victim's house recovered from house of appellant - Appeal dismissed. (Paras 8, 10, 12, 13, 28, 29 and 30)

       (1997) 10 SCC 44 - Relied upon.

       AIR 1964 SC 358 - Referred to.

Judgment :

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 449, 379, 380, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC). Appellant was sentenced to death for the offence relatable to Section 302 IPC, life imprisonment, 7 years imprisonment, 7 years imprisonment for the offence relatable to Section 449, 380 and 201 respectively. No separate sentence was imposed for the offence relatable to Section 379 IPC. For confirmation of the death sentence reference was made to the High Court under Section 366 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code). The appellant also preferred an appeal and by the impugned judgment, both the Death Reference and Criminal Appeal were disposed of.

3. The accusations in essence against the appellant are as follows:

On the intervening night of 6th and 7th January, 2001, when inmates of Aluva Municipal Town of Ernakulam District in the State of Kerala were in deep sleep, Manjooran House located in the midst of the town became a scene of ghastly crime. Six members of one family in the Manjooran House lost their lives in a matter of three hours, Antony @ Antappan, the appellant herein, in search of greener pastures abroad for which purpose he needed money but was refused to be paid by the members of the Manjooran family, and therefore as per the prosecutions version used knife, axe, amd electrocuted and strangulated Kochurani and Clara at about 10 in the night.of 6.1.2001 and Augustine, his wife Mary, and their children – Divya and Jesmon at midnight. The Manjooran House full of life at 10 in the night by the stroke of midnight became a graveyard. The appellant after causing the death of Kochurani and Clara is said to have waited for the arrival of other four members of the family who had gone to see a film show. On their arrival he turned them into corpses. He waited for their arrival to kill them as he knew that for the two murders committed earlier by him he would be suspected by them, as he was in the house when they left the house for the film show. The prosecution alleges that all these murders were cold blooded, planned and executed with precision and the appellant ensured that there is no trace of life left in them before he left the scene of occurrence.

When put to trial for murders, appellant, however, pleaded innocence and claimed trial.

4. The trial Court as noted above found the accused guilty.

5. Law was set into motion in the following manner:

Joseph @ Rajan on 7.1.2001 at 11.30 p.m. gave information to the Aluva Police Station of Ernakulam District that his sister, brother-in-law and their children were murdered by someone at sometime between 6 p.m. on 6.1.2001 and 10 p.m. on 7.1.2001 within Manjooran House, where his brother-in-law Augustine @ Baby, sister Mary @ Baby, children Divyamol and Jesmon, brother-in-laws sister Rani (Kochurani) and mother Rahel were living as a family. He requested for action in the matter. In the first information, Ext.P1, got recorded by N.V. John, Sub Inspector of Police. The informant Joseph stated that he had come to inform that someone had killed his sister-Mary, brother in law-Augustine and their children-Divyamol and Jesmon in their residence at Aluva. He belongs to Christian community and is residing with his father, mother, wife and children. It was stated by him that he was running a stationery store there and his sister Mary was married to Augustine of Manjooran House. His brother in law was running a hardware shop at Aluva. Both the children were school going. On 6.1.2001, his sister had come home to take his father who was sick to the hospital. His sister told him that she would come on 7.1.2001 by 9.30 a.m. to stay with them, as his wife was going to her house. On Saturday morning his wife went to her home. At that time, his sister Lizy, was in the ho











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top