SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 140

Supreme Court of India
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK
S. Nagaraj (dead) by LRs. & Others
Versus
B.R. Vasudeva Murthy & Ors. Etc. Etc.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3038 OF 2007 With Civil Appeal Nos. 3037/2007, 3049/2007, 3040-3047/2007, 3050/2007, 3941-3953/2007, Civil Appeal No. 1477 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18843/2007, Civil Appeal No. 1478 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18845/2007) and Civil Appeal No. 1479 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18846/2007)
Decided on : 08-02-2010

Headnote:A) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT : S.38(a) KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT : S.79(a), S.80, S.81 MYSORE PERSONAL AND MISCELLANEOUS INAMS ABOLITION ACT : S.10, S.9:- Pending the claim for issue of certificate of occupants in respect of the Inam lands before Divisional Commissioner under Mysore Personal and Miscellaneous Inam Land Abolition Act. land allotted to Kendriya Upadhyaya Sangha. One of the claimant withdrawing the civil suit challenging the allocation on the ground of an alleged out of court settlement accepting Rs,2000 per acre from the Sangha in addition to the compensation from Government. However legal heirs of the claimants challenging the allocation on various ground, the chief among being that sanction of agricultural land for non-agricultural house sites is contrary to Karnataka Land Reforms Act. This litigation ultimately ending with dismissal of the SLP against the order of the Karnataka High Court in the Writ appeal with a direction to the authorities to settle the application for occupancy certificates within three months. While a contempt petition was filed against the Government for disobedience of orders of the court, Minister Revenue Department of Karnataka passing an order granting 20 acres of land to the legal heirs of original occupants in lieu of the land already taken over and allotting 2 acres 34 guntas to the claimants free of cost. In the consequential writ petition challenging the same High Court directed payment of compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for house sites of 30 x40 ft. size and Rs.1,75.000/- for house sites of 40 x 60 ft. size and also quashed the direction to allot the alternate land of 20 acres to the Inamdars. This was again being challenged in the Supreme Court now in the present appeals. Held the earlier dismissal of SLP does not in any way disturb the findings of the earlier impugned Karnataka High Court and at the same time held that the order of the Supreme Court does not constitute any conditions upon the parties. Further held even fresh cause of action arisen in the form of order of Minister of Revenue, issues settled in the earlier Karnataka High Court Division Bench cannot be reopened. The Order of the Minister so far as giving possession of 182 vacant sites to the Inamdars is not unsustainable.

       

       

Judgment :-

A.K. PATNAIK, J.

Permission to file Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.18843/2007 and 18846/2007 granted. Delay condoned and leave granted in the Special Leave Petitions. We also condone the delay in filing the applications for substitution and allow the applications for substitution. We also allow the applications for impleadment.

2. These Civil Appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 22.12.2006 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in a batch of Writ Petitions in relation to 34 acres and 3 guntas of Inam land in Bangalore District which was allotted by the State Government to an association of teachers for construction of houses and for which the Bangalore Development Authority has sanctioned a lay out plan. The Bangalore Development Authority has filed Civil Appeal No.3037/2007, the legal representatives of Inamdars have filed Civil Appeal No.3038/2007, the Teachers Colony Residents Association has filed Civil Appeal No.3049/2007 and several owners of the house sites have filed the remaining Civil Appeals.

Facts

3. The relevant facts briefly are that the Mysore (Personal & Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954 (for short `the Inam Abolition Act) was enacted for abolition of personal Inams and other miscellaneous Inams in the State of Mysore, except Bellari District. On the Inam Abolition Act coming into force on 1.2.1959, all rights, title and interests vested in the Inamdars ceased and vested absolutely in the State of Mysore free from all encumbrances. Every Inamdar, however, was entitled to be registered as an occupant of land and could make an application before the Special Deputy Commissioner, Inam Abolition, for such registration as an occupant.

4. Sreenivasa Rao and Babu Rao, two Inamdars, filed applications for registration as occupants in respect of some lands in Survey Nos. 45 and 47 of Jakkasandra village, Bangalore South Taluk. When these applications were pending before the Special Deputy Commissioner, Kendra Upadhyayara Sangha (for short `the Sangha), an association of teachers, applied for grant of land for house sites to its members and the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, proposed grant of land measuring 34 acres 3 guntas in Survey Nos. 45 and 47 of Jakkasandra village in favour of the Sangha. The Divisional Commissioner, Bangalore, while recommending the proposal of the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, for grant of the land in favour of the Sangha, reported that the land in question was a Devadaya Inam Land in respect of which applications for occupancy rights were still pending settlement before the Special Deputy Commissioner, Inam Abolition. The Government of Karnataka in the Revenue Department by an order dated 15.6.1979 accorded sanction for grant of the land measuring 34 acres 3 guntas out of Survey Nos.45 and 47 of Jakkasandra village in favour of the General Secretary of the Sangha for providing house sites to the Members of the Sangha subject to the decision in the dispute pending before the Special Deputy Commissioner, Inam Abolition. The Government also fixed a price of Rs.10,000/-per acre amounting to Rs.3,40,750/-for grant of the land and a conversion fine of Rs.4,000/- per acre in its order dated 15.06.1979 and the amounts were deposited by the Sangha.

5. On 4.8.1979, Sreenivasa Rao filed O.S. No.687/1979 in the Civil Court, Bangalore, questioning the grant made by the State Government in favour of the Sangha and praying for a decree of permanent injunction against the Sangha in respect of the land. On 1.11.1980, however, Sreenivasa Rao and Babu Rao entered into an agreement with the Sangha to withdraw the suit on receipt of Rs.2,000/-per acre in respect of 34 acres and 3 guntas of land in addition to the amount of Rs.3,40,750/- deposited by the Sangha towards the price of the entire land with the Government. Accordingly, on 8.11.1980 Sreenivasa Rao filed a memo in the Court saying that he does not want to press O.S. No.68

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top