ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
DINESH – Respondent
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) QUESTIONING correctness of the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High court directing acquittal of the respondent, this appeal has been filed by the State of Uttar pradesh. Learned IV Additional Sessions judge, Lakhimpur, Kheri, had convicted the respondent for offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'ipc') and sentenced him for life imprisonment in Sessions Trial No. 469/92.
( 2 ) THE prosecution version in a nutshell is as follows: complainant Sita Saran (PW 3) filed a written report Ex. Ka-1 on 24. 5. 1991 at P. S. Kotwali, stating that he is a resident of Mohammadpur, p. S. Kotwali, and his sister is married to amritlal, Amkotwa (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased') resident of village Amkotwa. Today on 24. 5. 1991 he was going with his brother-in-law (sister's husband) on a bicycle from village Saherua at Amkotwa after delivering milk to Amebarati Lal at village saherua. He was accompanied by Ram lakhan of Amkotwa and his nephew Rajesh. When they reached near Habib's field from village Saherua, two persons named Dinesh, the respondent and Vinod, belonging to village Amkotwa, and armed with country
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Sanwat Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Ajmer Singh v. State of Punjab
Ramesh Babulal Doshi v. State of Gujarat
Allarakha K. Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P.
Harijana Thirupala v. Public Prosecutor, Court of A.P.
Ramanand Yadav v. Prabhu Nath Jha
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.