S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE three contempt petitions at the instance of the parties hereto have been filed for alleged violation of this Court's judgment and order dated 19. 9. 2005 passed in Civil Appeal No. 5807 of 2005.

( 2 ) THE basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. The parties are related. Sushila Raje Holkar, the applicant in Contempt Petition Nos. 6 of 2006 and 36 of 2006 allegedly executed an agreement of lease in favour of Col. Anil kak (Retired), the alleged contemnor and applicant in Contempt Petition No. 27 of 2007 on or about 11. 8. 1998 in respect of 4. 8 acres of land appertaining to Khasra No. 60. A registered deed of lease was executed by her in favour of the respondent for 16,000 square feet out of the aforementioned 4. 8 acres of land.

( 3 ) DISPUTES and differences arose between the parties. No registered deed of lease was executed for the remaining land admeasuring 1,21,721. 6 square feet which is in possession of the respondent. Inter alia, for enforcing the said purported agreement of lease dated 11. 8. 1998, a suit for specific performance was filed by the respondent which is said to be pending in the Court of XXI, Additional District Judge, Indore. App