SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 721

1996(3) Supreme 386
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.I., Sujata V. Manohar and B.N. Kirpal, JJ.
Mahe Beach Trading Co. & etc. -Appellants
versus
Union Territory of Pondicherry and Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 1412-13 of 1975
Decided on 4-4-1996

IMPORTANT POINT
By virtue of Section 18 of (The) Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, the Parliament vested with the Pondicherry Legislature the plenary powers to legislate with respect to the matters in List II and List III of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution and the said power has been validly exercised with the enactment of the Pondicherry Municipal Decree (Levy and Validation of Taxes, Duties, Cesses and Fees) Act, 1973.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 239A-Government of Union Territories Act, 1963-Section 18-Pondicherry Municipal Decree (Levy and Validation of Taxes, Duties, Cesses and Fees) Act, 1973-Validity of-Sections 3 and 4 not suffering from excessive delegation-Pondicherry Legislature empowered to legislate with respect to matters in List II and List III of Seventh Schedule-Said power validly exercised with enactment of Validation Act-Levy under Sections 3 and 4 of Validation Act cannot be said to be repugnant to Section 7 of Pondicherry Administration Act, 1962-Validation Act not repugnant to Section 21 of Government of Union Territories Act, 1963.

       Held : That if there is abdication of legislative power or there is excessive delegation or if there is a total surrender or transfer by the Legislature of its legislative functions to another body then that is not permissible. There is, however, no abdication, surrender of legislative functions or excessive delegation so long as the Legislature has expressed its will on a particular subject matter, indicated its policy and left the effectuation of the policy to subordinate or subsidiary or anciliary legislation, provided the Legislature has retained the control in its hand with reference to it so that it can act as a check or a standard and prevent or undo the mischief by subordinate legislation when it chooses to or thinks fit. (Para 13)

       Further held : Section 3 of the Validation Act has been enacted by the competent Legislature and it specifically empowers the levy of any tax, duty, cess or fee which the Legislature of a Union Territory had the power to levy. It further provides the tax to be assessed and collected for the purposes of the Municipal Decree in accordance with the provisions contained in the said municipal decree, and notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7 of the Pondicherry (Administration Act) 1962 or any other provision in that regard. This Section has to be read with Section 4 of the Validation Act which specifically validates the taxes which had already been levied, assessed or collected in the municipal communes, including the tax in question. At the time when the Valida tion Act was passed, all the essential ingredients of the levy and assessment of tax on petrol and diesel oil were known and available to the Legislature. The tax had been levied at the rate of 2% on the sale of diesel and petrol and the Legislative Assembly of the Pondicherry Union Territory in effect, levied this tax itself when it passed the Validation Act. As a result of this Validation Act, no further act of subordinate legislation had to be performed by any one. The effect of this Act, as already observed, clearly was that a specific levy which had been made in 1970, with the issuance of the "arrete" by the Mayor of Mahe, was re-enacted, with retrospective date, by the competent legislature. Therefore, the question of Sections 3 and 4 of the Validation Act suffering from excessive delegation does not really arise in this case. (Para 15)

       Reading Article 239A and Section 18 of [The] Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 together, it is clear that the Pondicherry Assembly had the power to make laws for the whole or part of Pondicherry with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State List or Concurrent List. Levy of sales tax would undoubtedly be within its legislative competence by virtue of Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule. The effect of Validation Act being promulgated was that the lavy on diesel and petrol would no longer be regarded as one being made under Municipal decree of 1880 by the Municipal Council but, in law, will have to be regarded as being a levy made by a competent Legislature exercising its powers by virtue of Section 18 of [The] Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 read with Article 239A of the Constitution. (Para 18)

       Consequently held : That the State Legislature as well as the Parliament has the power to legislate with retrospective effect and also to pass a Validation Act. This being so, and the powers of the Legislature of Pondicherry being co-extensive with the powers of a State Assembly, by virtue of Section 18 of [The] Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, there is no reason for this Court to hold that the Pondicherry Legislature could not enact a law with retrospective effect. In other words, by virtue of Section 18 of [The] Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, the Parliament vested with the Pondicherry Legislature the plenary powers to legislate with respect to the matters in List II and List III of the Seventh Schedule and the said power has been validly exercised with the enactment of the Validation Act. (Para 19)

       

JUDGMENT

Kirpal, J.-The appellants are the dealers in petrol and diesel oil in the former French Establishment of Mahe, now in the Union Territory of Pondicherry. The Erstwhile French Establishments in India were divided by the French Government into 17 Communes approximating to Municipalities or Local Self Governments. Mahe was one such Commune.

2. A French Decree dated 12.3.1880 governed and regulated the municipal body of each commune. It, inter alia, provided for setting up of a Mayor and elected Municipal Council. Paragraph 46 of the said Decree inter alia, comtemplated the Municipal Councils to deliberate the budget of the Communes as well as the mode of assessment, rates and rules regarding collection of all municipal revenues etc. The deliberations of the Municipal Councils were required to be forwarded to the Governor and would become enforceable only after the approval by the Governor in Privy Council.

3. By an agreement dated 21.10.1954, there was a de facto transfer by the French Government of all its French Territories to the Indian Government. Thereafter the Government of India in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Foreign Jurisdiction Act, 1947 made the French Establishments (Application of Laws) Order, 1954 and the French Establishments (Administration) Order, 1954. On 28.5.1956, there was a treaty of cession between the President of India and the President of French Republic in respect of the French Establishments in India including Mahe.

4. On 16.8.1962, de jure merger of the French Establishments with India was carried out through an Instrument of Ratification between the two countries as a result of which France ceded to India the sovereignty of its territories namely; Pondicherry, Karikal, Mahe and Yaman. The aforesaid four territories constituted the Pondicherry Union Territory.

5. On 16.8.1962, the Pondicherry Administration Ordinance, 1962 was passed which was replaced by the Pondicherry Administration Act, 1962. By Section 4 of this Act, all laws in force immediately before the appointed day in the former French Establishment were continued to be in force in the Pondicherry Union Territory, until they were amended or repealed by a competent Legislature or other competent authority. By Section 7, all taxes, duties, cesses and fees being lawfully levied in the former French Establishments were continued to be levied in Pondicherry Union Territory and were required to be applied for the same purpose until other provisions are made by a competent Legislature or other competent authority. The result of this was that the Municipal Decree dated 12.3.1880 could continue to be in force. Thereafter the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 was enacted by the Parliament on 10.5.1963, in exercise of powers under Article 239A(1). This Act provided for the establishment of a local Legislature and Council of Ministers and their powers, procedure and other matters.

6. The Municipal Council of Mahe on 7.8.1969 decided to levy a Municipal Tax of 5 paisa on each litre of petrol and diesel oil sold at the petrol pump situate in Mahe. The Mayor, based on that decision of the Municipal Council and considering the Decree dated March 12, 1880 issued and "arrete" with effect from 13.1.1970 for the levy of the aforesaid tax and its collection by the Receveur Municipal, or the agent appointed by him. On a representation by the appellant, the Municipal Council by another Resolution dated 15.5.1970 decided to reduce the rate of tax from five paisa to two paisa on each litre of petrol and diesel oil with effect from 24.2.1970 and an "arrete to that effect was issued on 16.10.1970.

7. The appellants then filed petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the said levy. A Single Judge of the Madras High Court struck down the said levy by holding that the tax was on the sale of goods and that it was levied in excess of the Municipality s power of taxation and the said levy also violated Section 7
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top