SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 242

DEEPAK VERMA, B. S. CHAUHAN, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted. Even though these appeals have a long and chequered history but it is not necessary to go into greater details thereof as on account of earlier orders passed by either the Full Benches of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh or by this Court, several questions have already been answered. However, a thumbnail sketch of the facts of the case would still be necessary to be dealt with which we will advert to.

2. These appeals have been preferred by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana against the common Full Bench judgment and order dated 27-5-2008 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in several civil writ petitions preferred by the respondents herein.

3. The whole controversy had arisen on account of certain alleged irregularities having been committed by the then Chairman of the Punjab Public Service Commission (for short "the Commission") Shri Ravinder Pal Singh Siddhu, who had allegedly shown favours to many candidates who had appeared for Punjab Civil Services, Judicial Branch, by awarding more marks and then recommending for their appointments on extraneous considerations.

4. The Full Bench of the High Court passed the foll




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top