SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 699

Y. K. SABHARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT, S. H. KAPADIA
T. N. GODA VARMAN THIRUMULPAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

[As Nos. 1598-1600 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

1. Ms Rachana Srivastava, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Reply to the applications be filed within four weeks. Two weeks' time thereafter is granted for filing rejoinder affidavit.

IAs Nos. 1601-03 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

2. The Central Empowered Committee may examine the matter and file its report within two weeks. The interlocutory applications are adjourned for two weeks.

IAs Nos. 1485 and 1507 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

3. The Government of India and National Mineral Development Corporation may file their response within two weeks. The interlocutory applications are adjourned for three weeks.

IA No. 1574 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

4. The affidavit dated 15-6-2006 filed by Mr A.K. Srivastava in compliance with the orders of this Court dated 28-4-2006, is utterly vague and does not disclose the relevant information as per the report of the Central Empowered Committee dated 27-4-2006, which, in turn, refers to the restoration of Gangao Dam.

5. It was stated that the first phase of the work would be executed within a period of three months i.e. from 1-4-2006 to 30-6-2006 and the second phase would be executed





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top