Mathai M. Paikeday vs C. K. Antony - 2011 Supreme(SC) 643

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2011 Supreme(SC) 643

Mathai M. Paikeday – Appellant
Versus
C. K. Antony – Respondent

ORDER

H.L. Dattu, J. —

Delay condoned.

1) Leave granted.

2) These appeals, by special leave, are directed against the common final order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in C.M.C.P. Nos. 53 and 60 of 2004 dated 11.08.2008, whereby the High Court has allowed the petitions and has permitted the respondent to prosecute the appeals as an indigent person.

3) The brief factual matrix relating to these appeals :- The appellant had filed two suits for recovery of money against the respondent, who is a retired Deputy Conservator of Forest drawing a pension of ‘10,500/-. These suits were decreed in favour of the appellant. Being aggrieved, the respondent had preferred Regular First Appeals before the High Court of Kerala along with petitions to prosecute the said appeals as an indigent person under Order 44 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The High Court of Kerala, without holding any inquiry as contemplated under Order 33 Rule 1A of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitted the respondent to institute the said appeals as an indigent person, against which a special leave petition was preferred before this Court. This Court remanded the matter to the High Court for pas