SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 562

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR DANGI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J.

1. Appellants, the State of Jharkhand and its functionaries, aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 23rd December, 2005 of the Jharkhand High Court, passed in LPA No. 161 of 2004 and analogous appeals have preferred these appeals by leave of the Court.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the Governor of Jharkhand in exercise of the powers conferred by 2 Article 309 of the Constitution of India framed Jharkhand Primary Teachers' Appointment Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) providing for appointment of teachers in Primary Schools. Rule 2(b) of the Rules defined `Trained' which reads as follows:

"2. Definitions : - x x x x x x x (b). `Trained' means those persons who have received the following training from the recognized institution and has passed-

(i) Two years Teachers training, or (ii) B.Ed/Dip. In Ed./Dip. In Teaching; and (iii) C.P.Ed/Dip.P.Ed. x x x x x x x"

3. Rule 3 of the Rules conferred power to the Jharkhand Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the `Commission) to publish advertisement inviting applications from citizens of India, who had passed Matricu























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top