Back
R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J. M. PANCHAL, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN
BHOPAL GAS PEEDITH MAHILA UDYOG SANGATHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also other learned counsel including the counsel for the State of Madhya Pradesh. The learned counsel for the gas victims submitted that the six hospitals which have been exclusively established for the purpose of treating the gas victims are being utili sed for the purpose of treating others and that causes great inconvenience to the victims and affects their treatment. We had therefore, directed the State of Madhya Pradesh to give certain clarifications by our order dated 15-112007. The State of Madhya Pradesh through its Chief Medical and Heath Officer of gas victims, has furnished the details/clarifications on 11-1-2008.
2. The Supreme Court Monitoring Committee will look into the clarifications furnished by the State of Madhya Pradesh and furnish its views as to whether the six hospitals for gas victims should continue to exclusively cater to the needs of the gas victims and whether the gas victim patients are put to any inconvenience by giving treatment to other patients in these hospitals. It may also suggest measures to use any excess capacity in these hospitals to treat other poor patients.
3. The learned counsel fo
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
