SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 401

DEEPAK VERMA, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, B. S. CHAUHAN
ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

IA No.5

1. Issue notice. In continuation of the order passed by this Court on 7-4-20101, we pass the following order.

2. Many of the States, for example, the States of A.P., Gujarat, Orissa, Maharashtra and Goa had already submitted that they have no objection with the recommendations of Justice Padmanabhan Committee and would take appropriate steps to implement the same. The States of U.P., Rajasthan, Orissa submitted that they would implement Justice Padmanabhan Committee Report with effect from 1-1-2006.

3. Some of the States, especially the States of Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Manipur and J&K stated that they have got serious financial constraint and some of the States have already implemented the Sixth Pay Commission and there exists disparity in the recommendations between the 6th Pay Commission and the pay scale suggested by Justice Padmanabhan Committee, which should be avoided. It is submitted that these States would be further financially burdened if present Justice Padmanabhan Committee recommendations are accepted. They also submitted that they should get assistance from the Union of India for implementation of these recommendations. Their contention is that the pay

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top